ENFORCE35338 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

;- III. Comments - Compliance Below are Comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. found to be in compliance with tkie regulations. Operator will supply llivision with "as built" of Prospect Pond at earliest opportunity (Pond was surveyed by independent contractor). 1:1.6 sideslopes need to be monitored by operator for stability during routine pond inspections. The Prospect Pond Ditch was inspected for slope (3-4%), inclination and ditch depth (2 feet). The ditch was walked in critical areas to check for topsoil depths and the ability of the ditch to retain expected flows without overtopping. Topsoil along ditch was pushed to outer edge of ditch and seeded as approved in the permit. Topsoil depths along portions of the ditch inspected averaged 12 to lb inches in draws and along occasional slopes with northern e:cposures and U to 8 inches (with a good deal of rock) along most of the ditch. In the Division's opinion, most of the area disturbed did not contain recoverable topsoil. Portion of ditch below the Section 16 Fill and other critical turns along the ditch need to be reviewed and closely monitored by operator to insure that peak flows will not overtop this new ditch in the future. Operator should submit "as built" for ditch to the Division at the earliest opportunity along with updated version of Map 12 showing location of ditch and small area exemption in Section 11. .-111 ditches wet•e found to be intact and functional. Tlie inlet to Stoker Pond was foi.rnd to continue to be downcutting despite attempts by operator to remedy situation lad~iitional road runoff has been routed to Stoker Pond for last couple of year: along main ditch) ~ similar situation is occurring along a portion of the ditch from the truck wash to the Shop Pond. Because of this apparent instability and failure of past et'torts to remedy these situations, the Division is requiring a revision with designs Cor stable channels for these two areas. The Division also requires a small area exemption justification for the main office area. 2.11 surface and ground water monitoring sites (including alluvial and fill wells) were inspected and monitoring procedures noted. The new Upper Goodspring well has been monitored concurrently with the old Upper Goodspring well for at least two quarters. Monitoring of the new Upper Goodspring surface water monitoring site must begin by the end of Octo'oer the cld Upper Goodspring site was recently inundated by beaver, as has been the case at the Lower Goodspring surface water site for come time. A discussion tool: place as to how to mitigate this. The operator should make some measurement of flow whan this ocr.urs. Iae contimrons flow monitcring derive at the Ta;,-l~~r Creep surface w,iter ;nonlturi. ~ stt~ 'u a:; I:~een rPmuve~l ~,: tin' L..,. ~~~-o:ogical .~rr-:ice~. W~ ~J