Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br />1 elements. So the Board needs to deal with those two ~ <br />2 motions -- requests from the party. <br />3 Then the second thing that hiss come up <br />4 since the last meeting, the division conduc~:ed as <br />5 inspection. of the site, and since that insp~action has <br />6 sent reasons-to-believe to Castle Concrete ~:hat they <br />7 are ir. violation of the law. And that raises some <br />8 questions about how the Board would like to proceed <br />9 today. <br />10 I will ex plain a little bit more <br />11 broadly about that. Wha t the law says under Section <br />12 120 is that the Board can't issue a permit i:o an <br />13 operator that is currently found tc be ir, v:iolation <br />14 of the law. <br />15 There are what I understand to be <br />16 essentially fear options that the Board cculd take <br />17 with respect to those violations. Ycu want me to <br />18 outline these right now? <br />19 CEAIRMAN DANIELSON: Please cto. <br />20 MP.. BAN''_'A: The fir=_t one is that the <br />21 Board could consider just keeping the two issues <br />22 separate; that is, that they have a request before <br />23 them for an amendment -- permit amendment <br />24 application, to proceed on that, to deal wi^:h the <br />25 reasons-to-believe at a later meeting, most likely <br />MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br />(303 424-2217 <br />