Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 next month, with whether they are ir. violation or <br />2 not. That's one option. Keep the two issues <br />3 separate. <br />4 Second option is that they could <br />5 consider the violations with in the context of the <br />6 decision -making process that you are in rigkit now, to <br />7 approve the amendment; that as a precondition to <br />8 making 2 decision or if the decision was affirmative, <br />9 to Sssue the permit, as a precondition to tk~at, that <br />10 the issue of the violation be dealt with. There, if <br />11 you want to get into that, there is soae legal theory <br />12 that Frank has looked into to support that position. <br />13 The third thing the Board could de: <br />14 Continue the next hearing to next month, at which <br />15 time the hearing on whether tc issue this permit and <br />16 the consi3eration of the reaso:^. to believe the <br />17 violation would be combined into a single hearing <br />18 next month. <br />19 The r, the fourth op±icn would be to go <br />20 forward with the henrinc today, but -- cn carious <br />21 matters other thar. the violation, but to elect not to <br />22 make a decision on the permit until you have had the <br />23 opportunity to hear about the alleged violations. <br />24 Now, the point or. the alleged <br />25 violations is that the ccr..par.y is e-:titled t~~ advance <br />6 <br />MIDY°TT P.°p 0..°,TING S5'P.VIC_° <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />