Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 decision, "Unless prohibited by statute, a government <br />2 licensing agency may modify its decision to grant or <br />3 transfer a permit corrected by errors or to alter its <br />4 ruling on the basis of newly di scovered evidence but <br />5 the modif ication must be for go od cause, and, in <br />6 italics, it must be within a ny statutory tine <br />7 limits." A number of cases are quoted. <br />8 Going down to Arabic 2, the 220-day <br />9 time period within which the Board could re=onsider <br />10 its approval expired on February 21, 1984. <br />11 Accordingly, as specified in 34-32-115, CP.S, the <br />12 permit was considered to be automatically a~~proved <br />13 when no one posted the bond on April 6, 198.4. <br />14 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Mr. Eva~is, if I <br />15 could, is it then your position that because the <br />16 hydrologic study wasn't submitted until something <br />17 like four hours before the hearins, thzt we should <br />18 have just simply gone ahead and denied your permit <br />19 application last month? <br />20 MR. EVANS: Qualification: "'hat' s an <br />21 inaccurate statement of t he record, !".r. Chairman . <br />22 The hydrologic study was submitted well ahead of the <br />23 hearing. A supplemental, requested by the :staff , was <br />24 faxed in to the staff as clarification prio=• to the <br />25 hearing. Now, that clari fication process i:; the very <br />29 <br />MITJ"ET_T R°__°ORTING S°R~/IC~ <br />(303J 424-2217 <br />