ENFORCE34479

• Permit No: M1977210
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Name: REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT
• Violation No.: MV1989015
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

30
1 purpose for which the statute gives the Board 120
2 days to consider something. If the clarifi~:ation is
3 needed, the staff has an opportunity to see:t;
4 clarification. If a definition of a particular
5 process is necessary, so that the staff can either,
6 say, accept or reject at its recommendation to this
? Board, that's what the 120 days is designed for.
8 But the statute is not that •-- doesn't
9 have those definitions. We submit that the•;~'re
10 implicit in the very formation that the legislature
11 formulated and gave to the Board and under its own
12 rules. So I am saying that the Board has been
13 removed from the respo nsibility of decision by the
14 legislative enactment under which it exists, wh ich
15 says, in our opinion, the permit as recomme:zded by
16 staff at the close of the June hearing, within the
17 120-day limi t, gust be issued upon the posting of
18 financial wa rrants.
19 CT_:AIRMAN DANIELSON: Thank you very
20 much.
21 MR. EVANS: I would like to siaply --
22 I know that Mz. Nussbaum at the -- I was reding the
23 transcript -- at the last h ear_n g, euestioned whether
24 it was necessary to supply legal informatio:~ to the
25 Board. Perhaps it becomes more relevant notia that i*_
MIDY°_TT P.EPORTING S~'.°.VT_C°
[phone]