ENFORCE34479

• Permit No: M1977210
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Name: REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT
• Violation No.: MV1989015
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

ze
1 and has never made a request.
2 The method by which it makes a request
3 is specifically set forth in your rules. Arid perhaps
4 Mr. Johnson can contribute soaewhat on this or Mr.
5 Nussbaum. You can't, in the opinion of the
6 applicant, go back after the fact and say wc~ will now
T find why we did this, if you did not do it before the
e expiration of the 120 days. So the filing date is
9 clear in your files and under your rules.
10
li
12 Now, if it
best clarification can be
Company, Division of Golf goes to the 120 dziys, the
found in New JersE~y Zinc
Western Industries:, Inc.,
13 versus Colorado Mine Land Reclamation. Board. Court
14 of Appeals, April 16, 1967, I have several copies of
15 tha*, decision, if anybody would like to rev'.ew it.
16 The pertinent la__^.guage o_' they decision
17 -- what I think is really pertinent comes under their
16 titling Roman's 1, third paragraph, once it
19 determines that the successor operator has met the
20 transfer requirements, the Board must co~ple~te action
21 on the application, italicized, within 120 clays, or
22 the permit, quote, shall be considered to be approved
23 and shall be promptly issued upon presentat'.on by the
24 applicant, end quote.
25 If you go to Arabic 1 under ghat same
MIDYETT P.°_POSTING S°_RVIC°_
[phone]