Laserfiche WebLink
<br />z7 <br />1 of a violation. And we're operating on a statute <br />2 which prohibits us from issuing a permit if there is <br />3 a violation and the first allegation we knew of a <br />4 violation actually occurred as a result of Mr. <br />5 Nagel's testimony at the hearing. <br />6 So given those circumstances, I thin.L• <br />7 that -- and the fact that I had not, frankly, at <br />8 least as one person there, even understood the <br />9 operator to have objected to the continuance, I am a <br />10 little bit concerned about this motion. So perhaps <br />11 you could -- would you mind addressing the question <br />12 of this 120 days' issue at this point. <br />13 MR. EVANS: I think the first -- the <br />14 definition of "file" is contained withir. the Board's <br />15 own definitions under Subsection 12. Filing date was <br />16 March 14, I believe, 1989. That can be reviewed. <br />17J The requirements of what "et cetera" means, how it's <br />18 acknowledged by the Board and, under these rules, is <br />19 contained in the Board's owr. procedural rules. The <br />20 continuance -- only an operator ca^ request <br />21 continuance, a Board or division reconsideration o` <br />Z2 application for a ~ermi± o^ an aaendment or <br />23 correction -- I am reading from 1.12. Castle .`.as <br />24 never requested a continuance, objected to :he May <br />25 continuance, did no: request the July ccnti:uance, <br />MID"4T^' REPOP.TING SERVIC° <br />(303) 424-22'_7 <br />