ENFORCE33767

• Permit No: M1980149
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Date: 10/23/1980
• Doc Name: PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT OF MLRB MEETING REGARDING WELD CNTY DEPT OF ENGINEERING FN 80-149
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

feels that they are going to deny it anyway, regardless, I would just as
soon vote today, because, rather than put more money Into it.
DICK WARD: That is what we would like to have you work on.
That's not what is being said at all, the way I understand it.
We said that there are inadequacies here that are not before the staff,
and the Board should properly be, work on those, get it into the staff ~
and then have a meeting of the Board, if it can be done on the 19th of Novembers
with your discussion of the oamership question, great. If not we will
try to accomodate a special meeting. When the staff is in a position to
make unequivical recommendations with fairly minor stipulations, this
is a laundry list, I don't see any of the Board members comfortable with it.
I think the option before you is to have it come to a vote and be either
voted up or more likely down today; or to request on your part a continuance
with that proposition that a special, meeting be called as you get the
material into the staff and the things that we talked about are satisifed
in their mind and they call us or November 19th preferably.
JOHN WARD: We do what we can to avoid actually denying a permit under these kinds
of situations. However, because once that action is taken then it requires
the applicant to go back and resubmit, republish, the whole bit. This way
if we are allowed to have more time so that we can get rid of some of these
problems plus the consideration of the objection rather then to be forced
into a situation where we don't (inaudible) to act positively, legally
we are trying to do something to accomodate you, rather than not trying
to stop your operation. But hopefully to make something compatible here
with the objections and with the concerns of the staff and also with your
timetable.
WAYNE SMITH: We wouldn't have even tried to get this on the schedule had we not felt
that basically everything had been resolved except for a few minor things.
I don't want to delay the issue but I think the things that have been
mentioned so far, virtually everything we have agreed to, concurred in,
and concluded that they would be done and there hasn't been anything mentioned
yet that hasn't already been resolved. Admittedly there are many things
on the list, Ralf of them a things that just comments, I don't have a list
of the comments, I read them over before lunch, they are just comments
statements from the county that we will do the reclamation. That is the
matter of, jusC our whole reclamation plan is submitted which is evidence
that we will do reclamation. I don't know what else we can provide.
Other than submit a reclamation plan and come down here and do a test try
on it. The, perhaps, these small items, had we had a little more time