Laserfiche WebLink
' <br />I 123 <br />1 <br />' 1 due to the spraying of the slurry? If there is, <br /> 2 then the total evaporation must be higher, which <br />' 3 means the water right you are going to need is going <br /> 4 to be higher than what they originally proposed. <br />' 5 M <br />f t <br />hi <br />i <br /> any o <br />he t <br />ngs Ph <br />l had already <br /> 6 covered, Z am in agreement with the lining <br /> 7 material. I think that if it's good for our dumps <br />' 8 today, it ought to be good enough for taking care <br /> 9 of something that potentially could have cyanide <br />t 10 contamination in it, so I would like to see that <br /> 11 there be a leak detection system installed <br />' 12 eventually. <br /> 13 Battle Mountain has committed to a <br />' ilit <br />i <br />i <br />lif <br />f <br />h <br />f <br /> 14 mon <br />tor <br />e <br />ac <br />y, <br />ng system during the <br />e o <br />t <br /> <br />' 15 which we saw at the beginning. what happens after <br /> 16 they leave? Will that monitoring continue on? <br />' 17 It's my understanding reports are <br /> 18 submitted annually to the Mined Land, Why aren't <br />' 19 they submitted to the residents of San Luis? Since <br /> 20 there is a water quality problem coming in here, <br /> 21 shouldn't the State Engineer's Office be infcormed as <br /> 22 to what the water quality problems are? <br /> 23 If there is contamination detected in <br /> 24 the monitoring holes that's being proposed ors the <br /> 25 downstream side, what will be the response of the <br />1 <br /> AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br /> <br />