Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' 12z <br /> 1 don't see it. <br /> 2 There is proposed a spillway made out of <br />' 3 c <br />r <br />n <br />t <br />t <br />b <br />I b <br />li <br />i <br /> o <br />c <br />e <br />e <br />o <br />e, <br />e <br />eve, po <br />nted out to be around <br />' 4 the collection pond area, that would take care of <br /> 5 the PMP, which I hope now would be based upon <br />~ , 6 19 inches of the precipitation and not 14 inches of <br /> 7 precipitation. <br />8 My question I would have there is, who <br /> 9 is going to maintain that structure? That has never <br />' 10 been addressed. I think it should be. <br /> 11 Also, has that structure been approved <br />' 12 b <br />th <br />St <br />t <br />i <br />' <br />Offi <br />t <br />dl <br />th <br />fl <br />E <br />h <br />? <br /> y <br />e <br />a <br />e <br />ng <br />neer <br />s <br />ce <br />an <br />e <br />e <br />ows <br />o <br />' 13 Is the energy being sufficiently dissipated at the <br /> l4 bottom? The diversion system, the soils in this <br /> 15 area are very erosive. <br /> 16 The amendment does not address whether <br />' 17 or not maintenance will be continued on the <br /> 18 diversion system and I -- as a specialist in erosion <br /> 19 control, I would have to ask, how often will those <br /> 20 ditches be maintained and, if they start failing, <br />' 21 h <br />t t <br />l <br />h <br />k <br />i <br /> w <br />a <br />ere to ma <br />ype of p <br />ans are go <br />ng to be out t <br />e <br /> 22 sure they are back into compliance? <br /> 23 Lastly, evaporation probably is correct <br />' 24 that they calculated in the application of being <br /> 25 about 40 inches. However, is there evaporation loss <br />1 <br /> AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br /> <br /> <br />