ENFORCE29346 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r~ III. Comments - Compliance r~ Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. found to be in compliance with the regulations. Operator will supply Division with "as built" of Prospect Pond at earliest opportunity (Pond was surveyed by independent contractor). 1:1.6 sideslopes need to be monitored by'operator for stability during routine pond inspections. The Prospect Pond Ditch was inspected for slope (3-4"/,), inclination and ditch depth (2 feet). The ditch was walked in critical areas to check for topsoil depths and the ability of the ditch to retain expected flows without overtopping. Topsoil along ditch was pushed to outer edge of ditch and seeded as approved in the permit. Topsoil depths along portions of the ditch inspected averaged 12 to 1~ inches in draws and along occasional slopes with northern exposures and 0 to 8 inches (with. a good deal of rock) along most of the ditch. In the Division's opinion, most of the area disturbed did not contain recoverable topsoil. Portion of ditch below the Section 16 Fill and other critical turns along the ditch need to be reviewed and closely monitored by operator to insure that peak flows will not overtop this new ditch in the future. Operator should submit "as .built" for ditch to the Division at the earliest opportunity along with updated version of Map 12 shotaxng location of ditch and small area exemption in Section 11. .all ditches were found to be intact artd functional. The inlet to Stoker Pond was found to continue to be downcutting despite attempts by operator to remedy situation iadciitionai road runoff has been routed to Stoker Pond for last couple of years along main ditch). A similar situation is occurring along a portion of the ditch from the truck caash to the Shop Pond. Because of this apparent instability and failure of past efforts to remedy these situations, the Division is requiring a revision with designs for stable channels for these two areas. The Division also requires a small area exemption justification for the main ot'fice area. All surface and round water monitoring sites (including alluvial and fill wells) were inspected and monitoring Procedures noted. The new Upper Goodspring well has been monitored concurrently with the old Upper Goodspring well for at least two quarters. Ponitoring of the new Upper Goodsprtn, surface water monitoring site must begin by the end of October the old Upper Goodspring sire was recently inundated by beaver, as has been rite case at the Lower Goodspring surface water site for some time. A discussion tool: place as to how to mitigate this. The operator should ma4;e some measurement of flow whin this occurs. Tile cuntin~.tous flow monitoring device at the Tayl~~r Cre.e!: surface water moniCnr~e~ dire has been remove.{ h~% tltr. l,. F,. ~.; e~.~lo~icaL ~r r~: ice.