Laserfiche WebLink
,' ~ ~' <br />Processing Plan Circuit <br />The San Luis plant or mill facility with associatied <br />beneficiation tanks is engineered as a fully-containedlarea, <br />i.e., continuous cement slab and curbing to contain pottential <br />spillage. Some minor spills from leach tanks have occurred but <br />have been completely contained in this area with no reSease to <br />the environment. <br />Tailings Pile Leak Detection <br />BMR believes the MLRD reference is to the leak detection <br />system incorporated into the double-lined collection p~nd located <br />below the tailings facility. Some seepage through theiprimary <br />liner during start-up was reported to MLRD. The prima y liner <br />has been repaired and seepage has been significantly r duced. <br />BMR believes the secondary synthetic liner and compact d subgrade <br />has not allowed any of the primary liner seepage to es ape into <br />the environment. Monitoring well M-9 is located downg adient <br />from the collection pond as well as the tailings facility and, as <br />noted above, has reflected no change in water quality. <br />Pieaometers <br />Piezometers placed in the tailings embankment to easure <br />potential pore pressure as a result of a phreatic surf ce build- <br />up has not indicated any significant build-up of pore ressure <br />according to design engineers Steffen Robertson and Ki sten. <br />Lysimeters <br />Three sets of vacuum lysimeters consisting of two lysimeters <br />per set are located below the tailings facility as required by <br />the water rights decree. All the lysimeters have been <br />consistently dry with the exception of L3W-4392 which as <br />reflected small amounts of natural moisture. While th sample <br />volumes were too small to obtain reliable analytical r sults, <br />BMR nevertheless had the samples analyzed by Acculab. The <br />enclosed analytical data indicates a total cyanide concentration <br />at the detection limit. These analytical results refl ct the <br />effects of the small sample volumes and resultant anal tical <br />interference in the cyanide analyses. Please refer to the <br />enclosed correspondence from Dr. Adrian Smith for a through <br />discussion of the analytical results. Dr. Smith concl des that <br />the data sets are invalid due to sample size and do no reflect <br />the presence of cyanide in the sample. <br />