Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />F.2. Comment: <br />The reclamation Plan Map should clearly show all ~~ermit <br />boundaries together with structures to remain on site Ripon <br />completion of reclamation. <br />Cotter Response <br />Exhibit F has been revised in response to this comment and <br />will be filed with the revised amendment application u~~on com- <br />pletion of the water quality impact study. <br />G.1. Comment: <br />The Colorado Division of Water Resources and the Colorado <br />Department of Health are reviewing this section, Appendix E-1, <br />E-2 and E-3 together with portions of other exhibits. A copy <br />of their review will be sent to the operator as soon a:s it is <br />available. <br />Cotter Response <br />No response required. <br />G. 2. Comment: <br />I have enclosed the March 17, 1983 memo from Jim :?endleton <br />and the March 15, 1983 memo from Joe Oliver. Please r~=_spond to <br />each of the concerns in detail and provide all request=_d infor- <br />mation. <br />Cotter Response <br />As noted in Cotter's response to MLRD Comment E.6. and <br />Cotter's April 20, 1983 transmittal letter to MLRD, all <br />responses to MLRD comments pertaining to the waste dumps <br />will be addressed upon completion of the water quality impact <br />study. <br />H. 1. Comment: <br />The staff will need the following information in order to <br />complete our review of your cost estimates. <br />-14- <br />