Laserfiche WebLink
513 <br />1 appropriate. That's what I'm suggesting here. Therefore, <br />2 31 days after August 23d would be the date for Item 2 of the <br />3 corrective action. <br />4 MR. FANYO: I believe it was 60 days. <br />S ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: Well, by all means, <br />6 correct me if I'm wrong. Yes, I think I am wrong. It's <br />7 June 6th till July 25th. Now, how long is that? <br />8 MR. FANYO: It was 10 days to start and 60 days <br />9 total. So it would be 50 days, whatever that is. <br />10 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: Sixty days later. <br />11 MR. RETRUM: From June 6th to July 25th? <br />12 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: June 6th to July <br />13 ZSth. Actually, it's 59 or 60 days. <br />14 MR. RETRUM: i believe that's correct. <br />15 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: I'm writing on the <br />16 notes then--we're on the record--that the time for abatement <br />17 by agreement was agreed to by the parties prior to this <br />18 hearing. <br />19 In order to avoid an early hearing in this matter, <br />20 the parties agreed that the abatement date was continued to <br />21 August 23d for Step 1. And then Step 2 would come into <br />22 effect 60 days thereafter. <br />23 Is that a fair evaluation of what was stipulated? <br />24 MR. RETRUM; Yes, Your Honor. <br />25 MR. FANYO: Sixty days, I believe, is correct. <br />Federal Reporting Service <br />(303) 751-2777 <br />