Laserfiche WebLink
<br />slz <br />1 merely stated that the abatement was continued to August <br />2 23d. It did not define first and second parts. <br />3 I need some resolution for the record on that. is <br />4 that Part 1 only? <br />5 MR. RETRUM: Steve, you want to address that? <br />6 MR. RATHBUN: Yes, Your Honor, I believe that <br />7 would be Part One--the initiation of the reclamation <br />8 activities. <br />9 MR. FANYO: For clarification, is it that the date <br />IO for initiation was extended to August 23d? Is that what <br />11 Mr. Rathbun said? <br />12 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: That's correct. <br />13 Part 2 provides--there was no stipulation as to <br />14 Part 2, which provided on July 25th it would be completed. <br />15 That allowed some 31 days. <br />16 So that I presume that the stipulation is that the <br />17 beginning date is August 23d and ends 31 days thereafter. <br />18 It must be completed by 31 days thereafter. <br />19 MR. FANYO: Your Honor, my understanding of the <br />20 stipulation was that we were essentially polling the run, so <br />21 that whatever the start date came--if, in fact it went back <br />22 into effect--they would measure the completion date by the <br />23 same duration from then, as was originally set. That was my <br />24 understanding. <br />25 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHILD: That would be <br />Federal Reporting Service <br />(303) 751-2777 <br />