Laserfiche WebLink
<br />quality. There is no practical reason to continue monitoring at Pond & <br />Spring 5-1 as no mine relate3 impacts can reasonably be expected to occur <br />at this site. <br />SP 6-4~: Spring & Pond 6-4 is located outside the area of any potential minim <br />impacts. 7.firis site was observed in July (pond full; 0.5 gpm outflow) arxi <br />August (pond full; trickle outflow) 1992. No water quality sat~les were <br />obtained as sufficient data already exists to establish pre-mining water <br />quality for this site. '!here is no practical reason to continue <br />monitoring at Pons & Spring 6-4 as no mine related ingaacts can reasonably <br />be expected to occur at this site. <br />S 6-6~: Spring 6-6 is located outside the area of any potential mining impacts, <br />'this site was observed dry in July arc! August. A review of the database <br />indicates this spring rarely flows. 'There is no practical reason to <br />continue monitoring at Sprirg 6-6 as no mine related impacts can <br />reasonably be expected to occas at this site. <br />SP 7-lZ: Spring & Pond 7-1 lies outside the area of arty potential mining impacts <br />given mine development to date. This site was observed in July (pond 1/3 <br />full; no measurable inflaa) and August (pond 1/4 full; no measurable <br />inflow) 1992. No water quality samples were collected as no flows were <br />observed. A sufficient water quality database exists to characterize pre- <br />mising water quality at this site. No mining has occurred in the vicinity <br />of this spring to date. No further monitoring was conducted during 1992 <br />as the sprirg was observed with no measurable flows and presumed to remain <br />in this condition throughout the remainder of the year. <br />S 21~: Spring 21 lip outside the area of any potential mining impacts given mine <br />development to date. This site was observed as a trickle in June, July, <br />ani August 1992. 'The June observation was omitted from the AHR. No water <br />quality samples were obtained as no measurable flows were observed. A <br />sufficient water quality database exists to characterize pre-mining water <br />quality at this site. No further monitoring was conducted during 1992 as <br />the spring was observed with no mPa~~rable flows and presumed to remain in <br />this wndition throughout the remainder of the year. <br />S 1-3': Sprirg 1-3 is located outside the area of any potential mine impacts. <br />'This site was observed to be flowing in July (10.7 gpm) and August (9.6 <br />gpm) 1992. Flow measurement and field parameters for August were Knitted <br />frown the AHR. No water quality samples were obtained as a sufficient <br />database exists to charac-tesize pre-mining water quality at this site. No <br />water quality samples were obtained as sufficient data already exists to <br />establish pre-minim water quality for this site. There is no practical <br />reason to continue monitoring at Spring 1-3 as no mine related i~acts can <br />reasonably be expected to occur at this site. <br />S 1-5': Spring 1-5 is located outside the area of any potential mine impacts. <br />'This site was observed July (no measurable flora) and August (dry) 1992. <br />No water quality sample was obtained as no flow was observed. A <br />sufficient database exists to characterize pre-mining water quality at <br />this site. There is no practical reason to continue monitoring at Spring <br />1-5 as no mine related impacts can reasonably be expected to occur at this <br />site. <br />10 <br />