My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV15531
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV15531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:26:52 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:06:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/20/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DMG
To
J.E. Stover & Associates
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2.03.5, Compliance Information <br />2. Please update Section 2.03.5, Compliance Information, if applicable. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Revised pages 18, 18a, and 18b were presented in <br />the submittal dated January 23, 2003. <br />Section 2.03.10, Identification of Other Licenses and Permits <br />3. If applicable, please update the ]ist of other licenses and permits in Section 2.03.10. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The operator stated that no permit updates were <br />required. <br />Section 2.05.3, Operation Plan -Permit Area <br />4. Please update BRL 's intentions concerning the disposal of the run-of--mine (ROM) pile <br />material. Does BRL still consider disposal of the ROM material on the east mine portal <br />bench (TR-39) a viable option or can TR-39 be withdrawn? <br />In the submittal dated March 28, 2003, BRL revised page 31 of Section 2.05 to state that <br />BRL will submit a technical revision that will deal with the disposal of the ROM material <br />at the various East Mine benches upon reclamation. In addition, as requested in a letter <br />from BRL dated March 28, 2003, Technical Revision No. 39 was withdrawn. That <br />revision involved the disposal of the ROM material on the portal bench at the East Mine. <br />The Division has three additional questions concerning the March 28, 2003 submittal. <br />a. In the fifth paragraph from the top on revised page 31 of Section 2.05, it is stated that <br />there are 6,000 tons ofROMmaterial left in the stockpile. However, in the next <br />sentence, it is stated that this remaining 17,000 tons ofROMmaterial will be <br />backfilled at the reclaimed East Mine. Please reconcile the difference in amounts. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The typographical error of 6,000 tons was corrected in <br />the submittal dated May 15, 2003 to read 17,000 tons on revised page 31 of Section 2.05. <br />b. Should the amount of ROMstated on revised page 31 and 606 of Section 2.05 be in <br />tons or cubic yards? <br />The Division has no further concerns. Pages 31 and 606 of Section 2.05 were revised in the <br />submittal dated May 15, 2003 to state that the units are in cubic yards. <br />c. Does the stated amount of ROM that remains include the cooly material that is <br />currently stored on the east end of the warehouse/shop bench? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.