Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />s <br />~ 1 that the amount of the recommended civil penalty which are being <br />2 considered today would be token amounts in consideration of what <br />3 I would be recommending. <br />4 With that as a backdrop, Mr. Chairman, I would like to <br />5 make a motion that this Board find no notice of violation. <br />6 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Is there a second to that motion? <br />1 7 MR. COOLEY: Second. <br />J 8 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Discussion. <br />9 MS. SAEGER-ROVEY: I did have some difficulty in it <br />10 being no violation. I know that we are not going into legal <br />J 11 things, but as an engineer, I see some things that have gone <br />1 12 wrong. And whether that was a fault of the Division or the Board <br />13 in the past or somebody else it leaves no remedy for the offended <br />14 parties. <br />15 MR. BANTA: I xould disagree with that because he has <br />16 has recommended that corrective action be implemented, and the <br />17 problem ramified or will come back and find violation and imposed <br />18 civil penalties for that crime. <br />19 MR. COOLEY: I think finding no violation and the civil <br />20 penalty really isn't going to give the parties any compensation. <br />21 lt's not going to help them any. I think the corrective action <br />22 would. I think, they could take comfort in the fact that the <br />23 company would be directed to do things differently and finance <br />24 the damage that there is there. <br />25 And I think that's where the compensation is. But I <br />