Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br /> 36 <br /> 1 amendment. And because I don't want to find out what the current <br /> 2 violation is,. and when I know it will hereafter we go through <br />J <br /> 3 all the merit then somebody will say, they are in current <br />J 4 violation. You couldn't probably issue them a permit. <br /> 5 And I think that the rule specifically says that an <br />7 6 operator can request an continuance. It can be granted for good <br /> 7 cause shown, and I think the good cause shown is we are now faced <br />J to <br />oin <br /> 8 g <br />with the violation, a corrective action plan, we are g <br />J 9 have to meet these things. I think it will be relevant to your <br /> 10 consideration whether or not we can, in fact, work the Williams <br /> <br />JJJ 11 Canyon side based on your new proposal so that we would avoid any <br /> 12 future spills. <br /> 13 And the language goes on to say denial of the request <br />J 14 would result in Board's decision of consideration of proposed <br /> 15 action within the statutory or scheduled time period. <br /> 16 Mr. Nussbaum--and I don't want to still his thunder, <br /> 17 but he is going to say, you have got it within a 180 days of the <br /> <br /> 18 thing coming off. We pointed that out on 120 day last meeting. <br /> 19 But we feel that the operator--the rules of intent for the <br /> 20 operator to request a continuance. You must be aware that the <br /> 21 1977 proceedings was a two-and-a-half-year continuance--Castle <br />I 22 Concrete. That what we had. <br /> <br /> 23 We got our permit in 1980, and because of the public <br /> 24 input you have to be there or your out of there. But this is the <br /> 25 type of thing that has happened, we took all of the information <br />J <br /> <br />