Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />la <br />1 doesn't--I am still--I am still not prepared to issue s notice of <br />2 violation. But I certainly concur in your concern with regard to <br />3 that, and I just--I guess I wonder and I ask the question is a <br />4 way to finesse that particular concern of yours is to make a <br />5 finding at all? <br />6 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Does that mean we have to have <br />7 another hearing? <br />8 MR. O'CONNOR: No, just leave it open until the <br />9 corrective action is completed. <br />10 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: I guess, Terry, I'd have to say <br />11 that if we did that, the one reason I caa think of for doing that <br />12 is the impact it has on the permit process. I don't see any <br />13 other rational on my mind for doing it that way. <br />14 MR. O'CONNOR: What's the impact on the permit process? <br />15 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: That's hard to sap. We've heard <br />16 discussion about how, if we found the violation, this would have <br />17 impact on the permit process. I am trying to keep that out of my <br />18 thinking, and I see on other violations, we don't do it. What, <br />19 in your mind is the reason for doing that in this case. <br />20 MR. O'CONNOR: It avoids the res judicator, the double <br />21 jeopardy issue. <br />22 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: It also leaves a great big hammer <br />23 over there head. <br />24 HS. I{AEGER-ROVEY: Say that in English, please. <br />25 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Res judicator means a decision has <br />