My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE25352
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE25352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:59:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/7/1989
Doc Name
REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT VOL II
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 been made, and you can not be tried twice for the same crime. <br />2 MS. KAEGER-ROVEY: Unfortunately you out number the <br />3 attorneys. <br />4 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: I guess I did have one other <br />5 thought today which is the--it is really unfortunate that this <br />6 comes up in the middle of all this other bunch of the permit <br />7 process for a lot of reasons. <br />8 And I guess I thought about that and my reaction to <br />9 that is this is a condition which in my mind is built up very <br />10 slowly over a long period of time, and there is no--it's not like <br />11 something happened on Tuesday, and that's when you can cite it. <br />12 The--it's a matter of judgment as to when to do it. <br />13 It's not to me terribly suprising that the permit <br />14 amendment of our staff is down there a lot more and paying a lot <br />15 more attention to this then they would be on the normal we had in <br />16 November. And therefore, if the operator is willing to take a <br />17 risk of allowing this condition to exist, they have to realize <br />18 that they are submitting a permit amendment that we are going to <br />19 be down there a lot. Again, I don't-- <br />20 MR. O'CONNOR: Let me ask this question. Despite what <br />21 I just said, what if xe were to go ahead in vote in favor of my <br />22 original motion, but my motion also had attached to it a Board <br />23 Order component to it directing them to come up with this <br />24 corrective plan. <br />25 And to complete the plan with all due diligence. No. 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.