REV13484 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Randy Spencer Ms. Susan Mowry August 1, 1985 • E.5 Page Five Bear Coal Company stated that they also had the Annual Hydrologic Report, although, they admitted that they had not covered all parameters that were included in stipulation No. 6. Bear Coal Company agreed that the report will be completed and submitted to the Division as required. It was suggested at this time that since both stipulation No. 4 and stipulation No. 6 were annual reports, that the Mine Usage and Inflow Report could be submitted within the Annual Hydrologic Report. This was agreed to by the Division. • E.6 The Division stated that quarterly Pond and inspection Reports need to be kept on file by the Bear Coal Company, although they do not necessarily need to be submitted to the Division. Bear Coal Company agreed to quarterly Pond Inspections and also agreed to keep them on file and available to the Division during inspections for both the sediment pond at Bear Mine No. 3 and sediment pond No. 3 at Bear Mine No. 2. • E.7 The Bear Coal Company did not understand why flow data needed to be required from Lone Pine Gulch. Susan stated that she did not know either but that it was in the Bear Coal Permit. It was agreed that data may not need to be collected and a minor revision could be submitted to the Division to clear up this confusion. • E.8 Bear Coal Company agreed to have the gated pipe installed as a principal spillway on Sediment Pond No. 4 reviewed as to applicability of its intended use. • F.1 Bear Coal Company agreed that after the survey of the Bear No. 1 and No. 2 Mines to ascertain responsibility of the area between Bear Coal Company and the West Elk Coal Company (ALCO), that a time table would be set up for conducting transplanting in the area.