My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV12889
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV12889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:23:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:37:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985210
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/21/1997
Doc Name
ROCKY ROAD QUARRY M-85-210 REPLY TO YOUR ADEQUACY REVIEW OF 5-14-97
From
BRADFORD JANES
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SOIL STOCKPILES <br /> <br />All soil stockpile locations should be identified and located on the mining plan <br />map. <br />Soil stockpiles are shown on the Exhibit 1/J Part I[ -Soils and Veget l ion Map, as <br />identified by the dark angular overlays. The description was not in luded under <br />a Legend, and as indicated above, will be updated at the time of the forthcoming <br />Technical Revision. <br />EXHIBIT J -VEGETATION INFORMATION <br />The baseline vegetation information is adequate as submitted. he various <br />communities or range site descriptions should be added to Exhibit 1/ as a legend <br />that ties into the soil unit numbers and delineations. <br />Agreed. Due to time constraints, we will update the map with this in ormation at <br />the time of the forthcoming Technical Revision when the survey ba ed maps are <br />submitted. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />With respect to success standards or release standards, the proposal of 10-25% <br />vegetative cover is rather arbitrary without site specific documentatio to support <br />it. For determining revegetation success, the Division relies on Ru e 3.1.10(1) <br />which states that the land should be revegetated in such a way as to establish <br />vegetative cover at least equal in extent of cover to the natural vege ation of the <br />surrounding area. Although this rule lends itself to relying on the rofessional <br />judgment of the inspector who is conducting the warranty release i spection, it <br />does provide more flexibility than a set live cover percentage. Th refore, the <br />cover standard should be removed from the application. <br />The 10-25% is a gross ocular estimate. Future vegetation stud es will be <br />provided to better assess revegetation efforts and aid in establishing targets for <br />release. The proposal was not intended to be absolute, never th less, it is <br />removed as a cover standard as requested. <br />However, for the shrub/tree plantings on this site, the Division propos s a replant <br />standard (one for one up to 50% of the initial stocking rate of 240 hrubs(trees <br />per acre) if more than 50% of any planted species dies within t o years of <br />planting. With proper care at planting, this should not be a problem. <br />Correspondence of Monday 18 May 1997 to Tony Waldron, Colorado Division of Mi erals and <br />Geology from Bradford Janes, for Doug Bachli, Rocky Road Quarry, DMG Permit 85-210. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.