My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE23992
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE23992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:35:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/7/1993
Doc Name
Request for Vacation & Information on NOV
From
ARCO
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1993113
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />s <br />IV. Enforcement Acttons <br />~~~" The following identifies enforceroenL actions taken during this inspection. the <br />• required abatement and date of abatement for the viotaiton, previous violations <br />still requiring abatement and. the ternination of violations cited during previous <br />lnspecLions. <br />Notic.: of Violation INU~') C-93-112 was issued for failure to <br />properly r,aCify surface land owners above underground Worltinga and <br />adjacent arenK 14.20.2(1-3)). The operator did notify Grand MOSB <br />Proparti~s in .a letter dated December 13, 1984, wl,o at that time <br />owne,i three-quarters of Section 20. (Curry ~Mauta~tiYs now the <br />property owned. However, the letter provided to Grand Mesa stated <br />that mining way to begin February 1, 1886; providing only three <br />months notification: The re¢ulations require notification at least <br />si,t montl•, prior #o m~ningy , Th.e ,J,,et,ter did apacify the areas in <br />which m4n~ns would 't.akatl plac~'a, b~,t ne¢'-leck.er!! informati~orn rega~•d;Rng <br />' the dnte$ of minl.ng activities that could cause aubsl•lence and <br />affect specific structures and the measures that would be taken to <br />' prevent or control ..advarae surface effects. Ar, .additional <br />landowner, the l1S Forest Service, was not provided an~w,~ptification <br />pursuant to the above referenced requlation..In order to abate the <br />violntior,, the company is required to prepare and send h letter to <br />all affected landowners who ware not properly notified pursuant to <br />Rule 4.20.2(1-3). $uPficient proof that the letter was received by <br />'.~ Lt,e l+xr,downera should be provided to the Division. The Division <br />would aug¢est that MCC submit the latter to the Division for <br />review, prior to sending it to the landowners. <br />NUV C-93-113 was issued for fail,rre to suh,nit proper permitting <br />documer,ta prior to relocating.toysoil piles. There were two <br />topsoil piles located on either aide oP the Sylvester Gulch road <br />that were moved sodutimo lest fall to the easier„ eloVe oP the <br />refuse pile. Rule ~.OB.312)(b) apecifioally states that <br />"stockpiled topsail and otl,..r• materials ah~ll not br moved until <br />required for radiytribution on a regraded area unless approved by <br />"' the Ulr•ision", In addition, the new location oP these topyai.l <br />piles ha~•e not been located on ti,e facilities map a9 .required by <br />Rule 3.05.3(81. [n order to abate the violation, t)re company is <br />,requl~ed to p1'•o~ic(e the pr.cper ,and adequate permitting ,documents <br />pursuant to Rule 2.Oa.3(51. <br />NOTE: Attach appropriate VIOLATIONS OR CESSATION ORDER CODING FORMS <br />Revised: 4/88 <br />Doc. No. B101f <br />'.....N.M ~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.