Laserfiche WebLink
PAR - C-80-007 - 2 - March 31, 1986 <br /> Avg' <br />B. The Length of th e Screened Interval ~ ~ vpQ, y <br />~l1QtCoup,~~o <br />~ ~\ ` <br />C. Depth of ,Well s <br />E. The Location of the Screened Interval Above the Coal Seam. <br />~~i,OR3. Page 2-414 refers to Exhibit 2.8.2A which is a composite barren <br />member well water level and spring elevation map. This map can not <br />^l pN~~~~a accurately represent the potentiometric surface of the overburden <br />~" DD aJ aquifer because all springs regardless of their source will issue <br />G~~`Q' from the land surface, thus the elevation of the spring will be the <br />1.; ~~ ~;~c~levation of the land surface. A contour map drawn from the <br />~ ~ elevation of these springs will have the same contours as the land <br />surface. Additional monitoring wells must be installed to further <br />i"ti.'~, define the Potantrometric Surface, on either side of the divide. <br />These wells should be completed identically, pump tested and <br />monitored for water level. <br />4. Pages 2-415 to 2-479 contain ground water monitoring data as recent <br />as 1980. Please include monitoring data that is more recent. <br />5. What impact has mining in the present 5 year mine plan area had on <br />,p.~_53~p the water levels in the water monitoring wells in the Barren <br />Member. Most notably the wells installed above the test panels. <br />If no effects were noted please discuss the reason for this. <br />6. Page 2-486 states that wells SOM-38-H-1 and SOM-38-H-2 were <br />_a unsuccessfully pump tested using the air lift method. Why weren't <br />Q other methods used to pump test these wells? Future wells should <br />be pump tested with ultimate methods if airlifting can not be used. <br />7. Pages 2-530 to 2-536 are calculations for mine inflow using the <br />Jacob and the McWhorter method. Given that the cone of depression <br />will extend to .5 miles after 5 years of mining how much water can <br />be expected to be removed from the Minnesota Creek Basin? <br />8. High rates of inflow were noted in wells along the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek and Lick Creek. The Creeks in the North Fork <br />Valley are known to be fault controlled. Since other mines in the <br />North Fork Valley have experienced increased inflows while mining <br />under creeks the wells may indicate zones of higher permeability. <br />From data obtained from these monitoring wells how much mine inflow <br />can be expected when these creeks are undermined? Additional wells <br />properly installed along Minnesota Creek will aid in this <br />determination. <br />9. Page 2-534 is a chart of projected mine inflows. This chart should <br />be calculated for the life of mine. Also, inflows from faults <br />should be calculated and included. <br />