Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT RENEWAL PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW <br />Marc , <br />I. Format & Supplemental Information <br />1. Provide information on the preparation of technical data and <br />information as required by Rule 2.03.3(4). <br />2. Many of the Exhibits throughout the application are not properly <br />referenced as to their location in the Table of Contents in Volume 1. <br />Please revise the Table of Contents to correctly give the location of <br />all Exhibits. <br />II. Other Licenses and Permits <br />1. Have Mine Safety and Health Administration permits been sought or <br />received for the refuse piles? <br />2. Federal and State approval for Huntington Canyon No. 4 Mines was <br />expected January 1, 1985. Have these approvals been granted? <br />3. What does "DOC" mean in reference to the Gordon Creek Nos. 3 and 6 Mine <br />on page 1-67? <br />III. Permi t Term <br />1. The acreage figures provided in the application form do not coincide <br />with figures on page 1-1, and Table 1.13.A. Please explain or rectify <br />the discrepancy. <br />IV. Land Use <br />1. A discussion of the condition and capability of the land within the <br />disturbed areas should be submitted in accordance with Rule 2.04.3(2). <br />V. Hydrology <br />A. Ground Water <br />1. Page 2-408. Mention was made that "no domestic, irrigation, stock, <br />commercial or industrial wells are located on the Mt. Gunnison No. <br />1 Mine permit area". Is this statement true for the life of mine <br />area? If not changes should be made to include those wells. <br />2. Page 2-409 is a summary of drilling and initial pump test data for <br />~ $ ~,~wells in the permit area. More detailed information will be needed <br />for these wells. The following should be submitted: <br />,off a.,a ,J A. Map Locating These Wells <br />C <br />