My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV11036
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV11036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:22:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:19:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977347
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/6/1994
Doc Name
SLAB CANYON LIMESTONE QUARRY PN 77-347 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
HOLNAM
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recognizes that after the overlying limestone has been removed, the <br />exposed sandstone slab will be relatively resistant to erosion. As <br />previously stated, erosion control structures will be necessary to <br />prevent rapid runoff from the sandstone slab from impacting <br />downslope areas. The applicant is required to address the impact <br />which surface runoff, originating on the permit area, will have on <br />the adjacent downslope land east of the permit. The adequacy <br />review of July 14, 1993 asked for sizing and locations of all <br />erosion control structures. Sizing is based on whether they would <br />be temporary of permanent. <br />The applicant states that temporary erosion control structures, <br />including stone berm filters and check dams, will be used at the <br />base of the disturbed area in the natural drainage:;. Each <br />structure needs to be designed and sized appropriately to handle <br />the peak runoff. from a 10 year/24 hour storm event. The <br />calculations included in the addendum for the #98 runoff curve <br />should be used with the acreage of the watershed which will impact <br />each structure. <br />Permanent erosion control structures include the tree pads and <br />sandstone benches. Each of these structures must be sized and <br />designed to handle peak runoff form a 100 year/24 hour st~~rm event <br />using t e #98 curve mentioned above. <br />~d <br />}~ ~'he Division maintains that,_ ice the area is disturbed, •a3~3 <br />"."H - . -- ~s~t or <br />should be accounted in the site specific storm water permit. •If <br />'~r ~ city of the runoff exceeds F feet per second, the checnnelized <br />will require riprap. Please state how any runoff will be r <br />(y"•Sf( u,R.P~ addressed. ~-Q.~,4 ~tt~ ~j~a_~,{-~ GCcM 4fY` 1-~'(.Gl'~-C~~(1~ <br />~.~,p,+""c^~'LRp,{-'~" ~ivl,l .•~C..~j +u.-tfp k;' c~Y~ LL ~lU[.d ~ y ~,, ~ ~ ~ p <br />5. Stability Of Loadout Benches - Tfie application s atesat~,~ ^p~p~, <br />permanent erosion control will be handled by inward sloping Loadout ~ 1 <br />~ benches. Some questions have been raised regarding the stability of <br />the Loadout benches on such a steep slope. The use of gak~bions or <br />rock buttresses has been discussed as one possible means of <br />stabilization. Please state the method that will be used to <br />stabilize these benches and provide the design to be followed to <br />ensure the means of stabilization will be adequate. <br />6. Sediment Control - All sediment control features, including <br />Loadout benches, rock berm filters and check dams need to be <br />located on Exhibit C and engineered to retain the appropriate peak <br />runoff for the specific drainage area to be retained. The runoff <br />~t the base of the disturbance must be no greate~7 The operator <br />must provide geotechnical documentation to demonstrate that the <br />Loadout benches will be stable both during dry and saturated <br />conditions. The check dams must also be engineered to retain the <br />appropriate runoff. <br />7. Soil Salvage - The application states that sandy overburden will <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.