My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22967
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22967
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/3/1996
Doc Name
NOV C-96-006 COLOWYO COAL CO LP C-81-019
From
COLOWYO COAL CO LP
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1996006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />5) By contrast, pit pumping from the West Pit to the E. Taylor Pond occurred with <br />absolutely unanticipated results. The quality of water was totally unexpected and, regretfully, should <br />never have been pumped to the pond. The water pumped to the pond had elevated levels of suspended <br />solids m total suspension which simply would not settle out. Subsequent analysis of the water indicated <br />almost no settleable solids but a high level of suspended solids. We simply never encountered water <br />like this before in our ponds. <br />6) We aze currently working closely with CDPHE to select a flocculent which will remove <br />the suspended material from the water before dischazging so as to meet effiuent limits. <br />7) The source ofthe suspended material appears to be a combination of 1) finely ground <br />clays and shales and possrbly coal fines from the mining operation being picked up in the surface runoff <br />and 2) pumping of the water twice (to get it out physically of the pit). We speculate that pumping <br />twice probably caused these materials to be further entrained into suspension. <br />8) The NOV abatement steps gave Colowyo two alternatives; 1) redesign the E. Taylor <br />Pond system to handle the poor quality water or 2) resubmit the permit page 4.05-6 to indicate that <br />pit pumping will not take place. Colowyo received the NOV on March 29, 1995 and immediately <br />submitted a request for MR-38 to facilitate the second alternate. Cleazly, until we can determine the <br />best way to handle the poor quality of water pumped recently into the sedimentation pond the better <br />alternative is to simply not pump the water out of the pit into the pond. <br />In conclusion, with respect to the issue of pumping water from the pit into sediment ponds, <br />given the historic quality ofthe water, we believe Colowyo has previously operated appropriately and <br />successfully addressed the Division's concerns through the permitting process. As we have stated <br />many times, our primary objective is to achieve on the ground compliance, and until the recent incident <br />with the poor quality water pumped into the E.Taylor Pond, our record shows we have done so. <br />This recent incident is very regrettable, unanticipated and we were unprepazed to handle the <br />flow ofpoor quality water that would not settle out the suspended solids. By responding immediately <br />to the Division's concerns in the form of a commitment to no longer pump pit water to the <br />sedimentation ponds we have shown that we consider this incident to be extremely important. <br />Please contact me ifyou have any questions concerning this matter. <br />Sincerely, ~ `~-`~ <br />liivrel~ ~ ~U <br />~ames A. I{iger <br />Sr. Environmental Engineer <br />xc: RG. Atkinson <br />KW. Wolf <br />files <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.