My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10417
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:15:17 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:12:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/3/1999
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Type & Sequence
MT4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. 7b demonstrate compliance with Rule 4.05.60 l)(g), the embankment surfacing should be <br />noted on the as-builts. Currently, no embankment treatment is indicated on Pond MB-1 or <br />MB-4. The Division requests that these be included on the as-builts. <br />8. Compliance with Rule 4.05.6(1 I)(h) can be demonstrated by including top-of-embankment <br />widths on the as-built diagrams. <br />9. In order to demonstrate compliance with Rule 4.05.6(1 1)1), the elevation of the bottom of the <br />channel should be shown on as-builts to determine accurate height. Also, a volume/elevation <br />curve is needed to evaluate pond size. For both Pond MB-1 and MB-4 the Division requests that <br />the elevation ofbottom-of-channel or of the lowest natural ground elevation encoutered by the <br />embankment be included in the as-builts, along with avolume/elevation curve. <br />INSERT TABLE TITLED "Pond Table for <br />Midterm" <br />Rule 2.05.4 Reclamation Plan <br />Several maps needed to assess compliance with achievement of the approximate original <br />contour (Rule 4.14.4) are insufficient. Map 58A (Materials Storage Bench Reclamation <br />Plan) can't be interpreted. Please submit a map or maps, either acolor-differentiated single <br />map including pre-mining topography, post-mining topography, and cut-fill details or <br />separate maps of the same scale and contour interval. (Maps may be submitted electronically <br />using AutoCAD 14.0). <br />The Division requests that Map 58 (Post Mining Topography and Approximate Location of <br />Shrub Clusters) be redone and resubmitted either as acolor-differentiated single map or as <br />separate maps showing pre-mining and post mining topography or indicate that Map 58 is <br />essentially diagrammatic and serves to show only the location of the shrub clusters rather <br />than details of topography. Even still, in the latter case, topographic lines should be <br />accurate and realistic (that is, post-mining topographic lines match up with pre-mining <br />topographic lines, topo lines don't "dangle" or terminate.) <br />3. Map 59A consists of four sheets ofcross-sections. Please differentiate these sheets in some <br />fashion, such as 59A 1, 59A2 or some similar way to allow readers to locate the information. <br />The key indicates that the location ofcross-sections are found on Map 58A, but 58A <br />contains only cross-sections A-A' and B-B'. <br />4. Please add a timetable for reclamation activities as required by Rule 2.05.4(2)(a). The permit <br />text (page 2.05-85) indicates that some of the information can be found in various locations <br />in the permit document. The Division requests that MCC provide a complete but succinct <br />timetable (such as in the form of a bar chart) that communicates a plan for reclamation timing <br />5. In the permit application page 2.05-67, MCC commits to sample redistributed soil materials <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.