Laserfiche WebLink
1 area, and still not have' the right to cross our property, at <br /> 2 say a private crossing. <br /> 3MC: Excuse me, my name is Mike McCarthy representing Nottingham <br /> 4 Sand & Gravel , I think that this coloquy right here demon- <br /> 5 strates that this is a question that has probably not been <br /> 6 presented in the correct forum. People are arguing back and <br /> 7 forth over who' s got what kind of property rights to do what, <br /> 8 and when you place that kind of question in context with this <br /> 9 kind of situation where this access is not on affected land <br /> 10 • • • At that point, I 'd also point out it is not a private <br /> 11 access that' s exclusive to Nottingham Sand & Gravel it also <br /> 12 serves adjoining landowners. So what we really have is a <br /> 13 threshhold question on jurisdiction. The Board is very well <br /> 14 aware, and I don' t want to belabor the point, but I just <br /> 15 wanted to point out this dialogue demonstrates that it is a <br /> 16 problem that needs to be resolved in another forum, not here. <br /> 17RW: That would be our final conclusion here that we don' t have <br /> is the . . . . <br /> 19C: I just wanted to have it in the records. Thank you very <br /> 20 much. <br /> 21RW: Let' s deal with the other, with the other objection from <br /> 22 Stemwedel Law Firm and . . . . <br /> 23G: I 'm Bill Goldstein representing the Eagle River Trust, Stemwedel <br /> 24 is no longer representing the Eagle River [unintelligible] , <br /> 25 some dialoging with your office, but now we' re handling the <br /> 26 affair. The Eagle River Trust is a separate entity I don' t <br /> 27 want you to be confused, the Eagle River Company, the Brush <br /> 28 Creek Company, are different as of Nottingham. And there' s a <br /> 29 very important initial objection which we have which is the <br /> -15- <br />