My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07486
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:19 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:43:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/7/1996
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PROJECT PN M-88-112 TR15 PROPOSED FINAL DRAFT DATE 2/5/96
From
DMG
To
BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD CO
Type & Sequence
TR15
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />at this well in the same manner as approved for new <br />wells SF-1, M-4R and M-15. <br />MONITORING PARAMETERS AND COMPLIANCE LEVELS: Does BMRI <br />want to include mention that Permit Condition values for <br />all new wells intended to be drilled in the near future <br />and to subsequently serve as Points of Compliance, eg. <br />SF-1, M-4R and M-15, will be set at the end of the first <br />monitoring year using the same Dixon methodology employed <br />to establish Permit Conditions for the existing wells <br />selected to serve as Points of Compliance? <br />REPORTING: The wording in the first paragraph under this <br />heading is phrased as to suggest that only values that <br />exceed Permit Conditions will be subject to notification <br />requirements and sample verification procedures. This <br />would seem to eliminate reporting and sample verification <br />of pH values that fall below the range of Permit <br />Conditions. It is suggested that the wording in this <br />paragraph be revised to consistently indicate values <br />outside the approved range of Permit Conditions are <br />subject to notification and sample verification <br />prodcedures. <br />REPORTING: The Divison would prefer some acknowledgement <br />be made by BMRI, possibly under this heading, that if an <br />indicator parameter value lies outside the range of the <br />equivalent Permit Condition in any quarterly monitoring <br />event and also continues to lie outside that range in <br />both of the two verification samples, that the Division <br />mad! notice BMRI of a possible violation of a condition of <br />its permit. <br />REPORTING: The wording in the second paragraph also <br />speaks only of "exceedances" while it is values of <br />indicator parameters that lie outside the approved range <br />of Permit Conditions that require notices and <br />verification samples. The Division suggests revised <br />wording to make that clear. <br />REPORTING: Does BMRI want to include a commitment, as was <br />done at one point previously, to construct quarterly <br />"control charts" for parameters serving aS Permit <br />Conditions and to submit these along with the reports of <br />the quarterly monitoring? <br />REPORTING: The Division requires a commitment on the part <br />of BMRI to submit the reports of the quarterly monitoring <br />on a quarterly basis. <br />DEFINITION OF TERMS <br />Permit Condition Values: The Division suggests that the <br />wording of this definition be modified to acknowledge <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.