My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03511
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:22 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:09:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/4/1989
Doc Name
SURFACE ROCK QUARRY AMENDMENT 2 FN M-84-001
From
MLRD
To
JOHN SCHMAHL
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Adequacy Concerns <br />Surface Rock Quarry Amendment <br />Application Form <br />~~ <br />1. A revised application form should be submitted so that the pe <br />acreage reflects the currently approved phase I, II and III a <br />Section 9. It does not appear that this area would exceed ab <br />acres. If a reduction in permitted acreage does occur, we wil <br />portion of the $960.00 application fee. <br />Exhibit C <br />tted <br />s, all in <br />25 <br />refund a <br />1. The Mining Plan Map should be revised so that it coincides wi h Exhibit A <br />of the Mesa County Settlement Agreement. Cross section locati ns A-A', <br />B-B'; the three phases and associated acreage should be includ d. The <br />relinquished area should be noted as such, and the 50.9 acre isturbed <br />area should be corrected. <br />Exhibit D <br />1. The mining plan must reflect those agreements reached with Me a County on <br />November 8, 1988. The mining plan should be revised to reflec the <br />conditions of Stipulation 5 of that agreement. The points whi h we <br />believe are most significant include: <br />a. No additional material shall be stockpiled in the phase III area; <br />b. No mining shall occur in the phase III area until mining is <br />completed in the phase I area, and until after the phase II <br />stockpile is removed; <br />c. The phase II stockpile must be removed or reclaimed wit <br />years. <br />2. The highwall stability report prepared by J.F.T. Agapito and , <br />Inc., indicates that the most stable highwall configuration o <br />series of 10 ft (east) to 15 ft (west) wide benches for every <br />vertical drop, with an overall slope of about 53°. Cross sec <br />and B-B' show a series of 15 ft wide benches with a 40 ft ver <br />It will be necessary to provide us with a stability analysis ~ <br />demonstrates that this configuration is at least as stable as <br />which Agapito and Associates analyzed. The stability analysi <br />provided prior to initiating further highwall excavation. <br />3. A detailed mining plan should be submitted for the phase III <br />plan should address waste and material stockpile locations an <br />n eight <br />sociates, <br />sists of a <br />'0 ft of <br />ons A-A' <br />cal drop. <br />rich <br />he one <br />must be <br />-ea. Thi s <br />volumes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.