Laserfiche WebLink
DELTA SAND AND GRAVI~CO. • PAGE 5 <br />MLRB PERMIT k M9- ~ Q d, _ ~ Q y <br />ADEQUACY RESPONSE I l <br />June 12, 1996 <br />SCS COMMENT LETTER <br />After reviewing the currently approved seed mixture we find that the SCS recommen- <br />dation of additional wheatgrass species to the mix will be redundant. We will stay with the <br />approved mix and commit to drilling the grass seed as suggested, where possible. The <br />current mix is: <br />SPECIES % ~PLS <br />Pubescent Wheatgrass (Luna) 20 3.5 <br />Jose Tall Wheatgnus (Jose) 20 4.5 <br />Crested Wbeatgrass (liycrest) 15 1.5 <br />Slender Wheatgrass (San Luis) 15 1.5 <br />Russian Wildrye 10 1.0 <br />Amual Ryegrass 20 2.0 <br />TOTAL '# t-f ~~ ° 100 14.0 <br />~~pt.s ~ ~ <br />~ivt d~ ,,~~,. <br />i <br />7i, c I CS6dQ' ~p~! <br />Z .I <br />Z,I <br />~ . 9' <br />~¢ ~ .l ~ <br />~4'G•e- ~,,.'f's s~vlcE <br />The last issue is the letter received by the Division on 7-June-96. This letter was <br />received by the Division well after the public comment period was over, three days. As such r ~'~~ <br />~,~ • the Division cannot include it in the review because it was received too late (rule 1.7.4(2)). bwsd~o„ <br />,~ ~e (~ I also point out that of the 9 signors to the letter 2 were adjacent owners, of these two, only qv'J c~;ve,..., <br />,P gone accepted the certified notice we mailed in April and he sent in a timely comment (see <br />above). I have chosen to comment on the contents of the letter to supply information that <br />may be important in the future and to set the record straight. <br />dt <br />1.~•"`~k ~ 1) We have no comment to this as it is not pertinent to the Division of Minerals and <br />~o~~"t ~', „~a.rL°"i4 Geology review process. We are in compliance with ALL local government require- <br />i;s~" '~ menu as we understand them. <br />~+v` ~) 2) As noted above, this is a county issue because the county owns the road. Delta is <br />(~+ discussing a solution to part of the problem with Montrose County. <br />~~°. ,~s~ 3) This is a typical smoke screen issue. We understand and know our responsibilities <br />CW regazding wetland issues and the permits necessary to disturb them. As I explained in <br /> our phone conversation the cattails that form along and around irrigation structures <br /> are non jurisdictional wetlands since they aze created because of imgation and not <br /> naturally occurring. <br />~~„ S . ~4) The electrical pedestal noted is owned by Delta -Montrose Electrical Association <br />~ <br />~, ?G (DMEA), it was moved before Delta Sand and Gravel acquiring the property and we <br />~ 1°`v~_ ~ can only assume that DMEA relocated it within their ROW. Mr. Million contracted <br />0 ~ <br />