Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• Page 5 <br />r~ <br />May 25, 2000 <br />(a) The last paragraph on existng permit page 2.0--16 (dated 3/3!99) is different from the first paragraph on <br />existing page ?.04-16.1 (dated 3/5/99). Please correct this discrepancy. <br />(b) The last paragraph on proposed permit page 2.04-16.3 (dated x/3/00), which begins with "pH", doesn't <br />seem to make sense. The sentence discusses the "...reclamation suitability of these roof and Door in... ". <br />Please correct this. <br />(c) For the proposed pemtit pages to Dow correctly into the existing pemut, proposed permit page 2.04-17.1 <br />(328/00) should be removed from the submittal, and existing pemvt page 2.04-17.1 (dated 3/5/99) should be <br />removed from the pemut. <br />72. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />73. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />74. This item has been adequately addressed <br />82. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />86. This item had been adequately addressed. <br />90. This item has been adequately addressed <br />93. This item has not been adequately addressed. <br />Map 2 indicates that "Regis College" and "Mack et al"own the coal in the E''/z of the NE '/< of Section 2, TSN, <br />R86W. This acct of land lies within the Foidel Creek Mine permit boundary. However, these entities have not <br />been included in the list of coal owners entitled "Coal Ownership within Life of Mine pemrit boundary" that <br />begins on proposed pemut page 2.03-15 (dated 3/5/00). <br />Please include "Regis College" and "Mack et al" in the list of owners of coal within the pemrit boundary. Please <br />include the full names and addresses of these entities. <br />96. This item has not been adequately addressed. <br />Existing pemut page 2.03-23 (dated 527/99) indicates that the Foidel Creek mine permit boundary in Section <br />25, TSN, R86W is" 112 NW/4, SW/4 NW4". This is not, however, the boundary depicted on Map 23, "Mine <br />Plan". The boundary depicted on this Map includes only aportion ofthe SW/4 of the NW/4, not the entire %< '/4 <br />Please revise the description of the pemtit boundary on exis~rrg permit page 2.03-23 (dated 527/99) to correctly <br />match the boundary depicted on Map 23. <br />Please also revise the depiction of the pennit boundary on Map] (Surface Ownership) and Map 2 (Coal <br />Ownership) to match the revised pennit boundary description in Section 25, TSN, R86W. This correction was <br />requested in DMG's adequacy letter of March 7, 2000. <br />