Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ Page 6 May 25, 2000 <br />97. This item has been addressed, with the exception of the following minor items. <br />TCC has provided a proposed replacement page 2.03-24 (dated 5/3/00). Inserting this page immediately after <br />existing petrrtit page 2.03-23 (dated 5/27/99). however, will eliminate the information pertaining to the TCC <br />permit boundary for Sections 26, 27, 28, and 29 in TSN, R86W. <br />Please revise proposed replacement page 2.03-24 (dated 5/3/00) to include the information pertaining to the <br />description of the TCC permit boundary for Sections 26, 27, 28, and 29 in TSN, R86W. <br />Please also revise proposed replacement page 2.03-24 (dated 5/3/00) to replace the " 3)" in the front of the <br />paragraph begins with "CERTIFICATION OF NAME CHANGE" (caps currently exist in the permit). <br />99. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />100. This item has been adequately addressed <br />101. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />107. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />108. This item has not been adequately addressed. <br />The Division, in its May 1, 2000 adequacy letter, stated that it was our understanding that during the <br />development of Gateroad 6 Right, a fault was encountered neaz the 25's crosscut that exhibited groundwater <br />inflow into the mine. The Division went on to say that we thought that this fault appeared to exist in either the E <br />'/z of Section 29, TSN, R86 W, or in the W %: of Section 28, TSN, R86 W, and requested Maps 6 and 23 be <br />revised to depict the location of this fault The Division additionally requested that if this fault were extensive <br />enough to be crossed by Cross Sections A-A' or B-B', TCC should also revise these cross sections to depict the <br />existence of this fault. <br />TCC's response stated, "The fault TCC crossed is shown on the appropriate x-sections". However, the only <br />faults depicted on Cross Sections A-A' and B-B' do not appear Coexist inthe E %: of Section 29, TSN, R86W, <br />or the W '/: of Section 28, TSN, R86W. <br />To elaborate upon our initial concern, we understand that Gateroad 6 Right encountered a fault near its 25~' <br />crosscut. Based upon our review of Map 23, the 25~' crosscut of Gateroad 6 Right appears to Ge in the very <br />western part of Section 28, TSN, R86W. <br />Please revise Maps 6 and 23 so that the location of this fault is depicted. If this fault is extensive enough that it <br />would cross through Cross Sections A-A' or B-B', please also revise these cross-sections to depict this fault. <br />The proposed decision date is May 26, 2000. Please call me shou]d you have any further questions. <br />