Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To assist with the assessment of the water-quality data for the humidity cells, the following <br />Table 2 itemizes the ICP scan and AccuLabs ICP and AA data sets generated to date and <br />contained in the CC&V submission. This Table 2 provides a guide to the overlap between <br />analytical data sets. Again, these analyses are continuing. <br />TABLE 2. TABUTA7rON OF COI~REHENSIVE WA7FJ2-QUAIIIY ANALYSES PoR NUAUDITY CEfLS <br />SAMPLE NUMBER (CORE) ICP SCAN (Number of Sw of <br />Aulyra) AauLh (Number of Sw of <br />Adtyw) <br />CB-6132 1 <br />cc 9a1(us-2so) 1 <br />CC 90.5 (190-195) 1 <br />CC 92-14 14 <br />CC 91-II (135-IS8) 1 <br />CC 92-23 (186-196) 2 2 <br />CC 92-26(178-188) 2 <br />CC 92-28(267-277) 2 2 <br />CC 92-33A I4 <br />CC 92-33A (186196) 2 2 <br />CC 92-76 (29-3Z) 1 <br />CC 92-38(105-115) 2 2 <br />CC 4210(305-312.3) 2 2 <br />CC 9211A 14 <br />CC 9212A 7 <br />CC 9218 7 <br />CC 9218 (40.50) 2 2 <br />CC 9219 (81-9n 2 2 <br />CC 9219 (245-250) 2 <br />CC 92-6I I4 <br />CR177 (120.140) 2 2 <br />CR-526(150190) 2 2 <br />Applicable Water- Ouality Standards. <br />Dr. Posey continues, in the Memorandum "CC&V has taken an approach to data <br />interpretation that probably will not be acceptable either to DMG or to CDPHE. They <br />conclude that the "ambient" water quality measured at Arequa Gulch WQCD Station #1 is <br />the criterion to aim for in terms of water quality. And this conclusion is drawn even though <br />many of the surface water quality measurements at AG-1 are not in compliance with the <br />5 <br />