Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE I. REPORTING LIMITS FOR ACCULABS DATA -APPENDIX 9, VOLUME X, APPLICATION RJR AMENDMFM <br />NUMBER 6, PERMfr M-80-214 (CRESSON PROTECT) mbmiued b OMLR October 7, 1994. <br />WATER-QUALTY PARAMETER <br />(Nol ~0 ue 'rWdrdr.') ACCULABS'REPORTING <br />LIMrr (mg/0 Crggk Clerk 'SUUdWr' <br />(Segmml22) Atub/Cbrooic <br />(Computed wing 400 mg/1 <br />bW budnar) (mg/0 Crippk CrWc'Sumd~nl~' <br />(Segment 22) AcvWChrooic <br />(cumPuma wing 220 mgn bW <br />hudnnr) (mg/0 <br />Comium 0.0003 0.019/0.0074 0.0032/0.0021 <br />Chromium 0.005 3.40/0.644 (Cr'"1 <br />O.UIW0.011 (Cr'~j 7.312/0.391(Cr'~ <br />0.016/0.011 (Cr'~j <br />Copper 0,003 0.063/0.079 0.077/0.027 <br />Iron 0.01 1.0 1.0 <br />Led 0.005 0.899/0.028 0.342/0.012 <br />bLgnoitan 0.03 Nacre None <br />M.ng.me 0.003 1.0 1.0 <br />Menvry 0.0001 /0.00001 /0.00001 <br />Molybdenum 0.01 Nam Nam <br />Nkkel 0.02 2.615/0.274 7.738/0.174 <br />PaWrium 0.7 None Nane <br />Selenium 0.005 0.01/ 0.01/ <br />siwtr o.aos o.azv 0.0014/ <br />Sdiim 0.1 Nom Nom <br />Straarium 0.01 None Nape <br />Zmc 0.003 0.779/0.717 0.228/0.207 <br />The twenty one pages of Tables in Appendix 9 that precede these AceuLabs data contain ICP <br />data which aze those data characteristically generated for McClelland Laboratories as part of <br />the humidity cell data. As is evident from the tabulations, the ICP scan provides data for <br />many more parameters than aze necessary to evaluate water quality and some reporting limits <br />aze higher than the ICP and AA analyses conducted to generate the AccuLabs data. <br />However, these additional ICP data have been generated for consistency with prior reports. <br />CC&V plans to soon discontinue the ICP analyses based on the adequacy of the current data <br />if the OMLR agrees, but we have not discontinued any analyses, regardless of justifications, <br />in order to avoid criticism from the OMLR. We presume Dr. Posey focused on these ICP <br />data rather than the AceuLabs data when he developed his comments. <br />Again, in summary, the vast majority of the reporting limits used for CC&V's routine <br />analytical work aze below the water~uality that might be used to judge acceptability for <br />Cripple Creek and for Fourmile Creek, the o~ two stream reaches that aze classified in the <br />area. Mercury is the single exception -and ambient mercury values reported throughout the <br />submission are at the detection limit of 0.0001 mg/1. <br />