Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />MLRB Presentation Form 4 April 29, 7999 <br />Delta Paving Gravel Pit File No. M-98-105 <br />2. /s the revegefation p/an contained in the reclamation plan appropriate and adequate? <br />Staff determined that the reclamation plan addressed revegetation of affected areas sufficiently to <br />demonstrate compliance with the performance standards of Rule 3.1.10 and C.R.S. 34-32.5-11614)(f) <br />and (k); supports the post mining land use as required by C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(2) and (4)(fl; and <br />satisfies the minimum requirements of reclamation plans as required by Rule 6.4.5, 6.4.6 and C.R.S. <br />34-32.5-116. <br />See staff response under items 3d, 4b, 4f, 4i, 4j, 4k, and 4n of DMG's Rationale for Approval <br />Recommendation. <br />3. May the Board incorporate other agencies' conditions into the reclamation permit? <br />In these proceedings, staff authority is limited to enforcement of the Construction Materials Rules and <br />Act. Permit documentation indicates that the applicant has committed to complying with <br />recommendations from wildlife agencies and has voluntarily entered an agreement with the Delta <br />County Commissioners regarding the proposed mining operation and reclamation of affected areas. <br />See staff response under items 3d, 3e, 3f, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4h, 4m, and 4n of DMG's Rationale for <br />Approval Recommendation. <br />4. Does the epplicafion adequately address the impacts of mining on riparian, wet/and, and <br />floodpla/n areas on the site? <br />Staff determined that the application demonstrated compliance with the performance standards of <br />Rule 3.1, and indicated that operations would be conducted in a manner which minimize disturbances <br />to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding area and to the <br />quantity or quality of water in surface and groundwater systems both during and after the mining <br />operation and during reclamation, as required by Rule 3.1.6 and C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(hl. Staff <br />review of the application, and comments received from other agencies, have not indicated that the <br />proposed permit area is located within lands where mining operations are prohibited by law or <br />regulation, as defined by C.R.S. 34-32.5-115(4)(f). <br />See staff response under items 3e, 3g, 3h, 3i, 3j, 4a, 4b, 4f, 4k, 6a, and 6b of DMG's Rationale for <br />Approval Recommendation. <br />5. Does the app/ication adequate/y address the possible effects of the mining operation on <br />