My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE73099
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE73099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998105
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/3/1999
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL APPLICATION MLRB PERSENTATION FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~,. <br /> <br />MLRB Presentation Form 5 April 29, 7999 <br />Delta Paving Gravel Pit File No. M-98-105 <br />floodplain areas where flooding may be aggravated by releases of water from upstream <br />reservoirs by the Bureau of Reclamation and the National Park Service? <br />The status of the potential activities proposed by the National Park Service and/or Bureau of <br />Reclamation, to release water from upstream reservoirs, is undetermined at this time. <br />The application indicates that mining operations will not be conducted within 100' of the ordinary <br />high water line of the river. The river banks should not be affected by the proposed operation. Staff <br />determined that the application appropriately addressed protection of surface and groundwater <br />systems from pollution, in accordance with the Act and Rules. <br />See staff response under items 3j, 3k, and 31 of DMG's Rationale for Approval Recommendation. <br />6. /s the topsoil replacement p/an adequate? <br />Staff determined that the portion of the reclamation plan addressing salvage, storage and <br />replacement of topsoil, supported the post mining land use and demonstrated compliance with the <br />performance standards of Rule 3.1.9 and C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(8), (jl and (p). <br />See staff response under items 4j and 4m of DMG's Rationale for Approval Recommendation. <br />7. is the proposed amounf of the financial warranty adequate to cover the costs of reclamation? <br />Pursuant to Rule 4.2.1(4) and C.R.S. 34-32.5-117(4)Ib)(11, staff calculated the total cost of <br />reclamation for the first year of operations at 532,962. <br />8. Should the Applicant be required to monitor water quality as a part of site reclamation? <br />The application indicates that pit dewatering will be necessary and that a discharge permit through <br />the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (WQCD), <br />will be acquired. Water quality monitoring of discharged waters will be addressed through the <br />Colorado Discharge Permit System, permitted and enforced by the WQCD. <br />Staff review of the application did not identify potential for adverse impacts to groundwater quality. <br />Groundwater will be exposed by mining operations. Therefore the application states that a well <br />permit through the Division of Water Resources of the Office of the State Engineer of the Colorado <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.