My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE68361
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE68361
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:14:00 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001035
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/8/2001
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY LETTER DATED 6/15/2001
From
ACA PRODUCTS
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. ~ . <br />w ~ • <br />of the final product; therefore we are not certain of any particular size that will be processed at any <br />given time. Size as well as quantity of riprap will determine the size and pattern of any particular <br />blast. Due to the nature of this type of rock, small blasts will be conducted to determine the drill <br />pattern and the loading pattern that will produce the desved product. We expect that the underlying <br />rock will produce the highest quality (hardness and wearability) for specific projects such as those for <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, while the outside or exposed portions will produce a less quality product <br />acceptable to private consumers, city and county customers. <br />This is not to say we are unwilling to provide you with blasting information. We have attached some <br />valuable information that should satisfy your request. We have made calculations based nnan a worse <br /> The smallest product will utilize the hi est powder factor and the most vibration._ Larger products <br /> promo u~at greater stances will be less nbration. This information is contained in the attached <br /> Trout Creek QuarTY -Blasting Information". <br />//i2. The reclamation plan for the quarry is as follows. The highwall will be stabilized as the quarry <br /> operation progresses by removing any loose material and/or rockbolting if it is deemed necessary, but <br /> is not anticipated. Due to the extremely hard nature of the granite in this area, we do not foresee the <br /> need for bolting mesh or fencing to the face or the use of shotcrete. These stabilizing methods are <br /> available to us, but we are certain they will not be necessary, as is confirmed in the stability analysis. <br /> The existing rock outcrops in this area have many vertical faces, and some negative slopes forming <br /> overhangs. The attached geologic report for the dam will show that this is very old, stable material. <br /> We hope to only have to scale the loose material, thus leaving a more natural appearance. Once <br /> mining is completed, the highwall will be left to take on the appearance of the surrounding rock <br /> outcrops by natural weathering. The floor of the quarry will be left slightly below the existing grade <br /> of the alluvium and covered with some of the recovered alluvial deposit near the Trout Creek channel, <br /> transitioning to topsoil and native seeding towards the highwall to leave it with a natural appearance. <br />7/13. The maps for Exhibit C have been modified to include all of the area within the existing permit area. <br /> The legal description, Exhibit A has also been revised to include this area. <br />/j14. Please refer to Exhibit F, Reclamation Plan, where we have indicated the final land use for the <br />~ different areas. <br />/I5. Since the flood in 1926, Trout Creek has been channeled in various areas as can be seen from the <br />t7 remains of several old channels. Since there are no USGS topo maps prior to 1926, it is impossible to <br /> tell where the original seek flowed or where it disappeared into the ground. We have seen no <br /> evidence that it flowed into the Arkansas River on the surface. There is curt I a desi ed channel <br /> from the stilling basin at the base of the dam. Please refer to the etter Gom Spann Engineering (see <br /> Item 16) for a channel data. The channel is based upon the 50-year flood, so it will be more than <br /> adequate for the 10-year, 24-hour event any years ago a channel was made to.divert.any_flows.to <br />),~ <br />~ ' the south, ou_[ of the permit area, along the base of the rock outcrop that continues to the south for <br />6~~('~ <br />~~h H ! <br />` <br />` `f many miles. We assume that previous owners of the.agriculturel land to the south may have done this <br />-~ to provide another source of water for crops or livestock. We intend to maintain this channel and <br />we ~'^ 2/~ make necessary improvements to handle a 10-year 24-hour flood event. It is also important to note <br /> at these flows are intermittent at best During the initial construction of the RCC dam, the <br /> foundation was excavated to bare bedrock where the initial concrete placements were begun. This <br /> essentially cut off any ground water flows in the Trout Creek bed. The only Flows in the channel will <br /> be when the irri anon line is not <br />in use. If, during any flows from the sway, seepage-from the.. <br /> _ <br />rversion channel should show up in the mining areas,__e_d'itch will be lined or sealed to prevent i[. It <br /> is for ese reasons that we do not expect to enccunter ground water in the mining areas. Any access <br /> across the channel will be made by installing culvert piping, as is the current situation. <br />y'~c-sue r~~ I6. Information regarding the range of Flows in Trout Creek can be found in the attached Hydrology <br />R i <br />r' Report for Trout Creek Dam by Spann Engineering, LLC. Mr. Spann has also included the <br />~ <br />~ information fora 10-year, 24-hour storm event in a separate attachment. <br />` <br />17. The sand extraction in Area B is not expected to intercept ground water. During the construMion of <br /> the RCC dam, the creek channel was removed to solid bedrock where the concrete and RCC were <br /> started. This essentially cut of any ground water flows. The only ground water that could be present <br /> would be seepage Gom flows in the channel downstream of the dam. The flows in the channel will be <br /> intermittent and can be controlled so that seepage will not be a faMOr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.