My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67879
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:13:33 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:06:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001090
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/31/2001
Doc Name
RIVER VALLEY RESOURCES REGULAR 112 ADEQUACY REVIEW FN M-2001-090
From
DMG
To
WESTERN MOBILE NORTHERN INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />the Riverview Resource site. Please note that no pumping equipment shall be installed in the <br />gravel pit well to withdraw water for any beneficial use, unless a separate written request for <br />variance has been approved by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and <br />Pump Installation Contractors (Board). Attached is a copy of review comments from the OSE. <br />Please respond. <br />The applicant states on page 11 that the operation will not affect groundwater quality on or <br />off the site. The applicant also states in the mine plan that the deposit to be mined is an alluvial <br />deposit directly associated with the Yampa River. And, the applicant states on page 5 that a <br />fueling/lubricating station will be located on-site. Please indicate the measures that will be <br />employed to minimize the potential for leaks and/or spills of fuel or lubricants to adversely affect <br />the surface and/or groundwater within the affected land and surrounding area, ie: Will a berm <br />and/or liner system or other containment system be used? IF yes, please describe such system. <br />JAI. The applicant states on page 13 that the mining operation will impact groundwater systems <br />hydrologically connected to the Yampa River. In conformance with Rule 6.4.7(2)(b), please <br />identify and characterize all known aquifers to be mined through or affected by the proposed <br />operation. <br />VII. The applicant states on page 13 that the depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 0 to <br />5 feet across the proposed site. Please explain what time of year (spring, summer, fall, winter) <br />this 0 to 5 feet groundwater level relates [o and the source or basis for this measurement. If <br />different, what is the expected high groundwater elevation during a "wet" time of the year? If <br />different, what is the expected low groundwater elevation during a "dry" time of the year? Please <br />respond. <br />u.3~ The mining plan specifies dry mining and dewatering activities. The mining plan specifies <br />that up to 84 acres will be excavated over a period of IS years and to a depth of approximately 3l <br />feet. Exhibit G on page 13 specifies that the consumptive use of groundwater from exposed <br />mining activities will only have a minor impact on the Yampa River and that the impacts can be <br />mitigated without injury to senior water rights. Please indicate the vertical and horizontal extent <br />of proposed impact to the groundwater system within the affected land and surrounding area due <br />to dewatering activities and any mitigation measures that may be employed during dewatering to <br />minimize such possible impacts. Also, please indicate whether the assessment of groundwater <br />impacts is based on quantitative analysis using existing site data or on a subjective analysis based <br />on similar dry mining operations. It may be useful to describe the maximum pit inflows expected <br />(based on known aquifer permeability and transmissivity as well as maximum surface area of <br />exposed pit wall) ,and pumping rate needed to assure dewatering of the pit for dry mining. <br />Please respond. <br />6.4.12 EXHIBIT L -Reclamation Costs <br />The Division has reviewed the reclamation cost and agrees that a total cost of $2~ is <br />acceptable for a maximum disturbance a[ any one time of 34.8 acres. <br />~a73,oo0 <br />~U ci.~pa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.