My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE67019
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE67019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 4 Alluvial Valley Floor Appendix & Alluvial Valley Phase I Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r 1 <br />L <br />I • <br />6.2 POTENTIAL STEVENS GULCH ALLUVIAL VALLEY FLOOR <br />In our opinion, the alluvial valley adjoining the CWI <br />well field, indicated on Plate 3. of this report, should not <br />be designated as an AVF. Although the. area is underlain by <br />unconsolidated, stream-laid deposits, there are several reasons <br />to exclude the area from the AVF_designation. They are: <br />1. Ground water depth measurements,shown on Plate 4, <br />indicate that the. area identified is not sub irrigated for a <br />sufficient period of the year to support agricultural activities <br />(2.06.8.(3)(iv)). <br />2. Visual reconnaissance for the presence of subir- <br />rigated indicator species (Appendix B-2) concludes that sub- <br />irrigated indicator species are confined to the extreme channel <br />bottom areas along the gulch (4 to 5 feet on either side of the <br />channel). The remaining parts of the area are apparently non- <br />subirrigated (2.06.8(3)(iv)). <br />3. The evaluation of the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservationist <br />(Appendix B) indicates that, although the soils are suited to <br />all the crops commonly grown in the survey area, it is not <br />likely to be used for intensive cultivated crops because of <br />the elevation (7,700 ft.) and the short growing season. The <br />evaluation is confirmed by the discussion with the owner, pre- <br />sented in the text of the report (2.06.8.(3)(v)). <br />- 20 - <br />cEaNVOao coruu~nr~, iNC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.