My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE66688
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE66688
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:12:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 6 Phase III Stability Analysis - Supplemental Geotechnical Study
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M92026GE <br />LJ <br />Gulch. An existing culvert is located at the bottom of the road <br />fill. The fill is about thirty three (33) feet high at its maximum <br />section and about thirty six (36) feet wide at the road surface. <br />The fill slopes have an inclination of about 2 to 1 (horizontal to <br />vertical). <br />2.3 Subsurface Conditions <br />The original July 1990 subsurface exploration consisted of <br />observing, describing and sampling the soils encountered in five <br />(5) test holes. The approximate locations of the test holes are <br />shown on Figure 2. The logs describing the soils encountered in <br />the test holes are presented in Appendix A. <br />The test holes encountered aggregate base course varying in <br />• <br />thickness from about ten (10) inches to about sixteen (16) inches. <br />The subgrade material encountered consisted generally of sandy and <br />gravelly clay. The sand and gravel content varied between test <br />holes. <br />3.0 PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS <br />It is our understanding that the plans are to upgrade the haul <br />road by addition of aggregate base course. Based on information <br />provided by Mr. Karl Koehler we understand that the traffic load <br />will be thirty five (35) coal trucks per day at about twenty eight <br />(28) tons each for a maximum of three (3) days per week. Our <br />analysis is based on the anticipated traffic and an R-value of the <br />3 <br /> <br />~Lam6ert anD ~,oootiateo <br />GO NSULTmG GEOTEGR NiCAL ENGINEERS AND <br />MATERIAL TESTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.