Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M95-026/Adequacy <br />4/24/95 <br />page 3 <br />ponds, low slopes, etc.) are to be carried out? How steep are the <br />slopes during mining? The access road is shown to cross Phase II <br />and enter Phase I. Will the access road location change as the <br />operation moves into other phases? If so, please indicate it here <br />and on the mining map. Concerning a detail of the planned phased <br />reclamation, what treatment will be carried out on the highwalls or <br />slopes which are adjacent to a future phase to be mined? For <br />example, will the north edge of Phase I be left as a steep <br />highwall, or graded, or temporarily seeded, while the operation <br />moves east into Phase II? What will be the method of topsoil <br />protection for the stockpiled material which will be stripped from <br />Phase I and reapplied on Phase IV, many years later? Is any <br />topsoil stripping or excavation to occur in the "Staging Area" of <br />Phase I? <br />EXHIBIT E - RECLAMATION PLAN <br />Overall, the reclamation plan appears adequate. The SCS recommends <br />that you save 12 inches of topsoil. Other information supplied by <br />the SCS (part of Exhibit I) states that the soils present on this <br />permit area typically have 8 to 11 inches of topsoil depth, and <br />some restriction to effective rooting depth at about 32 inches of <br />depth. You have committed to strip and save 6 inches of topsoil in <br />your plan. I would encourage you to commit to saving as much as <br />you can, for better reclamation success. Also, instead of a <br />specific depth, I would encourage you to commit to saving and <br />replacing topsoil within a range of depths, in case there is some <br />variability of depths present now, or in how ~ exact the topsoil <br />is replaced. Be reminded that the specifications you commit to and <br />which are approved, are the standards which the reclamation must <br />meet. Are there any roads or other structures to remain on the <br />site after reclamation? <br />EXHIBIT F - RECLAMATION MAP <br />There are two conflicting sets of information shown on this map. <br />The main problem to remedy is the incorrect topographic contours. <br />After mining they should shift to the northeast, into the hill. <br />Instead they shift to the southwest, indicating a large fill. <br />These conflict with the 3:1 slope faces as drawn on the map <br />afterward. The contours should roughly correspond to the slope <br />faces, at least on the north and east sides, as drawn on there. <br />EXHIBIT L - RECLAMATION COSTS <br />The figure you have provided is probably low, but because the <br />county is the permittee and there is no requirement for a financial <br />warranty, this is a moot point. Just as a note, when a bond is <br />required, its amount is influenced by the extent and type of <br />disturbance at the site. A figure of $500.00 per acre is generally <br />what it costs for seedbed preparation, seeding, mulching, and <br />fertilizing. It does not include earthwork such as road removal, <br />