My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE65755
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE65755
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:11:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 9:02:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995026
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/24/1995
Doc Name
CUSTER CTNY GRAVEL PIT M-093 MLRB FN M-95-026 112 PERMIT APPLICATION TECHNICAL ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
CUSTER COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />M-95-026/Adequacy <br />4/24/95 <br />page 4 <br />highwall reduction, final grading, or topsoil replacement, which <br />are usually the expensive items. Timely and successful concurrent <br />reclamation will greatly keep overall disturbance, and therefore <br />the final reclamation burden minimized. <br />EXHIBIT O - PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE OF PERMIT APPLICATION <br />This exhibit, which your outdated application calls Exhibit R, asks <br />for proof that the application was sent to the local Soil <br />Conservation District, not to the SCS. We have received the <br />receipts of certified mail to the SCS. I have spoken to Alex <br />Parrott of the SCS to verify that he actually forwarded the notice <br />of application to the Custer County-Divide Soil Conservation <br />District, as our rules require. A separate mailing of notice is <br />not required by you at this point, but future applications must be <br />noticed to the local soil conservation district, not the SCS. <br />EXHIBIT R - PROOF OF FILING WITH COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER <br />I had previously overlooked this item during my review, but it is <br />present in the application, and therefore this item is satisfied. <br />Be reminded, however, that you must place all additional materials, <br />modifications, and correspondence on file there for public review. <br />When you have submitted all responses to the items in this letter, <br />please place them on file at the clerk and recorder's office, and <br />provide us proof of that filing. <br />There are no further items which I feel must be addressed by you at <br />this point. Please provide the necessary clarifications or <br />information, and any map revisions, as soon as you can. The <br />decision date is still set for July 12, 1995. I will want to visit <br />the proposed site in the next month, and I will contact you to <br />arrange a time. You may submit your responses to this letter <br />either all together or in several mailings, as you wish. If Custer <br />County is considering another 112 permit application in the future, <br />please contact us for requesting an updated application form. <br />If you have any questions regarding this adequacy review letter, <br />feel free to contact me. <br />~~~rely, <br />Bob Oswald ~ <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Frank Beebe, Abel Engineering Professionals, Inc., <br />807 North Greenwood, Pueblo, CO 81003 <br />b:\dmgcor04.95/16-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.