My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63573
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:42 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:04:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/22/2004
Doc Name
Public Comment & Objection Ltrs.
From
DMG
To
Banks and Gesso LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CERTIFIED MA-L-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br />TO: Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Rm: 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 .December 11, 2004 . <br />FROM: I.L. and L.M Tumer 3945 Douglas Mtn. Dr. RE~%~9~/E® <br />Golden, CO 80403 ~ ~'-~ <br />,DEC 15 2804 <br />RE: Proposed MMRR Quarry S <br />Gilpin, COUnty, CO Division of riAlncrcis a Geology <br />Comments Concerning Construction Material 112 Permit <br />Based on <br />Reports Provided to the Public <br />Please note the fioilowing: <br />• 1Ne are the. contiguous property owners: I.L. and L.M. Turner and own <br />approximately 95Ac_ In Gilpin County (includes 9 Ac: in :lefferson <br />Carroty).. See,Cl~ac Creek Disfrict,iNgfer providers' ~xhibif (map) G -1. <br />-Please note do error in designated owri~rsfiip: The S1N1 /4 bf the SWl /4 <br />Sec..2-A,73S, R72W. (38.46 Ac.).b~14ng5 rt0 iumer.NOT to Wolf as <br />cfe{lgna~.ed; _ ......... ., ... ... , <br />Though this error may seem inconsequential, it fends to falsely <br />enhance the Wolf property's shie(dirig other ownership from any <br />quarry operations and to lessen 7umer's exposure. Also please note <br />that the presence of such an error of material fact tends to •bring into <br />question the accuracy of other parts of this permit application. <br />• The possible occurrence of uranium mineralization in btasthote <br />cuttings and airborne dust. Reference to the attached figure from: <br />"Geology of uranium deposits. in the Front Range, Colorado": P.K Sims <br />and D.M. Sheridan. 1964 • shows that there exists the possibility of <br />cutting through significdnt uranium mineralization during mining <br />operations and having it.occur in dust from drilling, blasting, and rock- <br />Crushing operations. • Should this project be allowed, certainly uranium <br />•analyses of early drill cuttings should be made before giving a ftnal go- <br />ahead to,Tjroduction. Routine uranium blast hole cuttings analyses <br />during arty producti4n,should,a_lsq, t~,e required., • _ , ., , <br />;•.(See also: ;'RacioaCt'ry,.~iiliriergj Occurrerc~~s ;bf~Coiorado' ; f3411e'tin ' <br />,40. Nelson .= Ailoore, Collins.and Ho'mtialt~r°; Coloracio'Geologicaf <br />Survey, 19.78:.1058 p. Gilpin County, p. 159-16K and Clear Creek <br />County, p. 96-110. Two maps from this'pribiication are atfctched. '' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.