Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Ca+trol Division <br />Amerulment No. l -Rationale -Page 4, Permit No. CO-0044776 <br />2. Discussion of Effluent Limitations • <br />a) Requlation~or EfRtrent Limitations: The Regulations jot Effluent Limitations (5 CCR 1002-62, Regulation <br />No. 62), apply ro the conventional pollutants. For this facility, the limitations jot BOUs and Taal <br />Suspended Solids are based on this regulation. These limitations will +feterntine compliance with state <br />secondary treatment standards. Additionally, ti+e lin+itntions for Total Residtrnl Chlorine, pH and Oil artd <br />Grense are based at [his regulation in the absence of any applicable water quality standards. <br />b) Applicable Federal Effluent Guidelines and Standards: No federal effl+renr guidelines apply to this domestic <br />WW'TF. <br />c) Fecal Coliform: Tl:is facititv's jtnal discharge goes to an unclassified ditch Utat does no! enter tf:e Nord: <br />Fork of the Gunnison River or otter state waters within five miles. Therefore, in the absence of applicable <br />fecal colijornt standards, the fecal colijorm [imitations are based on tl:e Division's fecal colifonn policy. <br />The policy specifies limitations of 6,000!12,000 colonies per 100 mPof effluent (30-day geometric mean/7- <br />day geometric mean, respectively). <br />d) Total Ammonia: As stated elsewhere, the discharge goes to an unclassified ditch. There are no water <br />quality standards for ammonia shat apply to this discharge. For this reason, neither ammonia limitations <br />nor monitoring are required for this discharge. <br />e) Antidegradation: Since the receiving water is unclassified, an antidegradation review is nor required <br />pursuant to section 31.8(1) of The Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water. <br />f) Salinity Regulations: /n compliance with the Colorado River Salinity Standards and the Colorado Disch~ <br />Permit System Regulations the permittee is required to monitor effluent jot total dissolved solids on a <br />quarterly basis. Please see Part 1.8.2. of the permit for additional requirements. <br />g) Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET! Testing: WET testing is not a req+rirentent at outfa[1 004. WET requirements <br />apply to permittees that discharge to surface waters of the state. The Bozvie Resources, Ltd. domestic <br />wastewater treatment facility discharges to Deer Trail Ditch, which is not a state water. As stated <br />previously in this rationale, because of the long distance from the discharge point to the point where Deer <br />Trail Ditch flows into the North Fork of the Gunnison River, this discharge is not expected to impact state <br />waters. <br />B. Monitoring <br />Influent and F,Qluent Monitoring: Influent and effluent monitoring will be required as shown in Table VI-2. <br />Refer to dte permit for the location of the monitoring points. Division monitoring policy specifies that when a <br />jaclliry has detention of less than 24 hours, composite sampling is required for BODs, TSS and total ammonia. <br />During the site application process, the state geologist recommended thnt influent and effluent flow recording <br />occur to indicate if any x•astewater is lost within the WWII' and to reduce the potential for failure of rite sloping <br />ground on which the WWTF is located. The site approval makes this a requirement unless the perminee can <br />provide another acceptable means of monitoring for Leakage. If the permiuee seeks to use an alternative to <br />influent and effluent flow recorders for this demonstration, a description of the alternative should be submirned <br />to the Division for consideration during the public comment period jot amendment number 1. Otherwise, be[h <br />flow recorders will become required under this permit. Part I.E.S. of the permit requires installation of an <br />effluent flow measuring device within ninety days after the permit becomes effective along with a demonstration <br />that 10% accuracy of readings is aaained, so the flow recorder requirements would become effective ninety <br />dms after nntersdment number 1 becomes effective. A compliance schedule ~+ilt be indtrded in the permit for. <br />installation of the influent flow rnenstering device within the same time periozf. <br />