Laserfiche WebLink
z o <br />.~ <br />Mr. Gilbert F, Rindahl <br />-4- <br />March 21, 1983' <br />b. Uue to ttre fact that some of the species {such as Blue gra~na) <br />are difficult to establish, intimate soil-seed contact is <br />vital. Therefore, the operator should commit to either drilling <br />\,~ the seed mixture at half of the given rates or describe how the <br />i., seed will be covered after broadcasting. Any extra reclamation <br />costs due to these procedures should be added to Exhibit L. <br />,I C. Weed control should also be added to the estimated reclamation <br />costs. <br />8. Reference my comments under Exhibit D, question 2 concerning the <br />timetable for this operation. h-ly comments also apply to the phasing <br />of reclamation. <br />9. Mention is made of leaving slopes at a maximum steepness of 5:1, <br />except for "scarps" and "sub-vertical cuts". Where are these <br />~~ "scarps" and "sub-vertical cuts" within the permit area? Why are <br />they to be left if the area is disturbed? Also, what is meant by a <br />"sub-vertical cut"? <br />1110. The transition between paye E-4 and page E-5 results in a nonsense <br />'x\ sentence. Perhaps a phrase or line was omitted. Please clarify this <br />matter. <br />}}, Statement #4 on page E-ti that states that the operation "will require <br />~~;~ no additional large siltation structures from drainways" has not been <br />L~'` ty- justified. See my comments under Exhibit D, question 9. <br />Exhibit F <br />This outline of the 80 acres of affected land is not given on this map. <br />'`This should be provided. <br />`Exhibit G <br />\11. Reference any comments under Exhibit D, question 9. <br />2~~,Although a rigid sediment control plan may not be possible, the <br />>'" operator could commit to a general plan for protection of the <br />l drainage Swale to the west, outlining the types of methods to be <br />!yam used. The general design considerations given on page G-2 are a step <br />in that direction. <br />Exhibit N <br />1. This is, in general, an excellent wildlife review. Unly one question <br />seems to be necessary. Your general future land use is reclamation <br />~ to rangeland, and yet the Q.U.W. evaluation mentions homes beiny <br />~ built. Please clarify this situation. <br />0 <br />