PERMFILE61419 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXHIBIT E (RECLAMATION PLAN) #3 OBJECTION: Applicant has again avoided a commitment to salvaging all top soil possible and has not committed to reclaiming any specific amount of land. #15 STATEMENT: 'Tracks will remain after final reclamation...' OBJECTION: The area is not zoned for a commercial tourist train, and therefor the tracks cannot remain. DEFICIENCY NOTICE CMLRB112 EXHIBIT D (MINING PLAN) STATEMENT: 'There are no sediment ponds and check dams...' CONTRADICTION: Answer to item #10 refers to a "sediment pond at the sandstone quarry" And is then contradicted again in EXHIBIT D 1.3 Last Paragraph "The quarry plant will be started to co construct sediment ponds and stormwater berms." EXHIBIT D (PAGE 12) STATEMENT: 'Traffic will use pre-existing road across the stream' OBJECTION: The road referred to was not in existence before exploration of the area by applicant. STATEMENT: 'Installation will ~ to occur during the 5-6 months when the stream is dry' OBJECTION: During the past fifteen years I have not seen the Tallahassee Creek dry. Also, any construction involving the wetlands area of Tallahassee Creek must betake place and be completed during the colder winter months to avoid the disasterous results that would occur during the Flash flooding that warm weather brings. EXHIBIT E (RECLAMATION PLAN) #8 STATEMENT: 'There is no limestone in the permit area' GONTRADIGTION: 1.4 Santl and Gravel "The gravel deposit rests on steeply dipping Mesozoic sediments including sandstones shales and limestones of the Dakota group. EXHIBIT G (WATER INFORMATION) STATEMENT: Paragraph states that '600 foot distance only applies if open water is planned for the project and that the 600 feet would only apply from the open water to any nearby wells.' OBJECTION: I believe my husband's adjudicated spring can be considered a well. If high sediment wash water is dumped into the applicant's gravel pit it will, without doubt, adversely affect his well. EXHIBIT D CMLRB112 (PAGE 12, PARAGRAPH 2) STATEMENT: 'It does not mean that the clear span of each crossing will allow all of the water calculated to come from a 10 year storm event and that larger storm events will probably cause some minimal water to go over the top of the crossings.' OBJECTION: Knowing the area as I da, I believe that storm water going over the orossing structure proposed by the applicant's engineer would simply wash