My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61006
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:58:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/2/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07 Letters on Ponds from WWC Engineering
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Mc Crellin Scott <br />July 3Q 2002 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />4. Prospect Pond, 007A As-Built. This drawing, provided by Colowyo Coal <br />Company, was used to obtain the dimensional information necessary to model the <br />pond in SEDCAD 4. <br />~. Prospect Watershed SEDCAD 4 Model Input. These sheets provide a summary of <br />the input data into the new SEDCAD 4 model of the Prospect watershed. <br />6. CN Breakdown. This color figure shows the curve number breakdown for the <br />watershed. Dark green is undisturbed (CN=47), green is reclaimed 3+ year growth <br />(CN=56), blue is reclaimed I to 2 year growth (CN=61), and red is reclaimed <br />topsoiled and seeded (CN=86). This figure represf:nts the watershed immediately <br />afrer the pit is backfilled and is considered the worst-c;ase scenario. Prior to that time, <br />the pit intercepts a large portion of the watershed. Curve numbers were obtained <br />from "Methodologies and Assumptions for Sedimentation Pond Evaluations" of the <br />approved permit (Volume ZC). <br />7. Prospect Sedimentation Pond Summary. This table provides a quick reference to <br />the differences between the current model of the Prospect watershed and earlier <br />versions. The summary sheet indicates that the drainage area decreased 38.2 acres <br />between ] 998 and 2002 and the discharge parameters for the 10-year and ZS-year <br />storms generally decreased. The pond summary sheet also predicts the Prospect Pond <br />has 1.2 years of sediment storage. <br />8. SEDCAD a, Prospect 10-year, 24-hour Model. Thais is the printout of the ]0-year, <br />24-hour design storm. This model demonstrates that using the design storm the <br />Prospect Pond is in compliance with an effluent discharge of less than 0.~ mI!I <br />settleable solids and no discharge in the emergency spilhvay. <br />9. SEDCAD a, Prospect 25-year, 24 hour Model. The spillway is adequate. <br />]0. SEDCAD ~, Prospect 100-year, 2=1-hour Model. The spilhvay is adequate. <br />11. SEDCAD ~, Prospect TR-60 Emergency Spilhva}• Evaluation. The Prospect Pond <br />~~as assumed to be a Class B pond for a TR-60 emergency spilhca} evaluation. The <br />rainfall amount used for this model was the 100-year, 6-hour amount plus 0.12 times <br />the difterence behveen the probable ma~inuim 6-hour amount and the 100-vear. 6- <br />hour amount. The model shows the spilhca} is adegi_iate to meet the TR-60 criteria <br />for a Class B structure. The probable mazinunn precipitation was determined from <br />HMR -19. <br />W <br />WC Engineering <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.